Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use accumulo store for better effectiveness on properties matching? #737

Closed
chpengzh opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Use accumulo store for better effectiveness on properties matching? #737

chpengzh opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@chpengzh
Copy link
Contributor

@chpengzh chpengzh commented Feb 23, 2018

What if consider about implement another Apache-Accumulo store.

Accumulo provide iterator runtime which aimed to implement properties matching down to store process.

I'd wonder if there is possible to implement a Gradoop-Accumulo

chpengzh added a commit to chpengzh/gradoop that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2018
chpengzh added a commit to chpengzh/gradoop that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2018
@chpengzh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chpengzh chpengzh commented Mar 5, 2018

I implement an accumulo datasource and a datasink, would you please tell me, which kind of task case should i add for DataSink and DataSource test?

@s1ck
Copy link
Member

@s1ck s1ck commented Mar 7, 2018

This sounds interesting but I wonder in which scenario we would currently benefit from predicate push down as we internally always create the EPGM Pojos first (which needs to change in future). Anyway, it would be nice to support Accumulo as data source / sink. The tests should be similar to the ones in gradoop-hbase.

merando added a commit that referenced this issue May 18, 2018
* add accumulo store implements and test unit

* update readme, rename confusing class name

* fix spelling mistake of test suite name
@chpengzh chpengzh closed this May 23, 2018
0x002A pushed a commit to ChrizZz110/gradoop that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
…g#759)

* add accumulo store implements and test unit

* update readme, rename confusing class name

* fix spelling mistake of test suite name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants