Topic Branches

Vitor de Paula edited this page Nov 9, 2018 · 2 revisions

by Wincent Colaiuta

Using topic branches when contributing patches

A “topic” branch is a separate branch that you use when working on a single “topic” (a bug fix, a new feature, or an experimental idea). Working on a topic branch instead of directly on top of “master” is recommended because:

  • it allows you to work on multiple, separate topics simultaneously without having them all jumbled together in a single branch
  • topic branches are easily updated, which means that if the remote “master” evolves while you are working on your topic it is easy to incorporate those changes into your local topic branch before submitting (which in turn will make your topic apply cleanly on top of the current “master”)
  • if you receive feedback on your patches, having all the related changes grouped together in a topic makes it easy to tweak them and resubmit
  • working on a topic branch makes it easy to refactor a patch series into a logical, clear, clean sequence, which in turn makes your contribution easier to review and more likely to be included

So, for all of these reasons it’s recommended to use a topic branch for preparing submissions even for simple contributions like single-commit bugfixes and the like.

Basic topic branch workflow

Let’s assume you are working in a clone of the official repository. If
you set this up using a standard “git clone” then your local “master”
branch will be set up to track the remote “master” branch automatically.

 # make sure that you're on your local "master" branch
 git checkout master

 # integrate latest changes from upstream
 git pull

 # create and switch to new topic branch named "my_topic"
 # (obviously you'd pick a more descriptive name)
 git checkout -b my_topic

 # now work on your submission, committing along the way

 # when ready, make a patch series for attachment to a lighthouse  ticket
 git format-patch master

That last command will create a numbered series of patch files, one for each commit on your topic branch (ie. all the commits since you branched off from “master”).

Advanced topic branch workflow

If your topic is long-lived then you can use “git rebase” to keep it
up to date and massage it into shape. Imagine that the remote master
has three commits at the time you start working:


You make a topic branch with three new commits:


Meanwhile, the remote “master” continues to evolve and has three
commits of its own:


Without “git rebase”, the only way to get your changes into the
“master” branch is for the integrator to perform a merge, creating a
new merge commit, M:

       \         /

With “git rebase” your changes can be “rebased” on top of the current
remote “master”. Git actually removes your three commits (X, Y and Z),
“fast forwards” your topic branch to incorporate the latest commits
from upstream (D, E and F) and then replays your commits on top of the
new HEAD.


In this way when you submit your patches they can be applied using a
simple “fast forward” merge which yields a nice, linear history:


The content of the commits is the same but I’ve used the X’, Y’, Z’
notation to indicate that the SHA-1 hashes for them will be different
(because any change in their ancestry will bubble up and change their
identifying hashes).

There is no merge, so your patches are guaranteed to apply without
merge conflicts. If there are any merge conflicts you will have
already resolved them when you ran “git rebase”. (This appropriately
shifts the burden of resolving merge conflicts away from the central
integrator onto the contributor; in this way the project can scale to
have many contributors without the integrator becoming a bottleneck.)

To make use of all this, all you have to do is:

 # integrate the latest upstream changes into your "master"
 git checkout master
 git pull

 # make sure that you're on your topic branch
 git checkout my_topic

 # do the rebase
 git rebase master

git rebase can do more than just keep your topic branch up-to-date.
Given our example commits X, Y and Z you might want clean up the
history to make it easier to review (because the easier to review, the
more likely it is to be accepted, you’ll receive better feedback, and
bugs are more likely to be caught). By running git rebase --interactive you can:

  • remove a commit from a series (you realize that commit “Y” doesn’t really belong in the series)
  • amend a commit (you realize that the commit message for “X” isn’t quite right)
  • insert a commit into the series (you realize that you actually need a “W” commit before “X”)
  • “squash” several commits into one (you realize that “X” and “Y” just
    make the same change in two different files, and so they logically
    belong in a single commit)
  • re-order commits (you realize that the series will be easier to
    understand if “Z” comes before “X” and “Y”)

When you run “git rebase —interactive” you’ll see an editor window
that allows you to perform all of the above operations in a simple
fashion; you are presented with a list of commits which you can
transform as follows:

  • delete a line to drop that commit
  • use “pick” (the default) for commits which you want to appear in the
    rebased history
  • change “pick” to “edit” for each commit you wish to amend (or
    perform additional commits) along the way
  • change “pick” to “squash” for each commit which you want melded into
    the previous commit
  • reorder the lines to reorder the commits

The rebase will stop automatically for all commits you’ve marked as
“edit”, and will provide you with an opportunity to edit the commit
message for commits melded together with “squash”. It will also stop
if there are any merge conflicts to resolve. When you are ready to
resume the rebase you just do:

git rebase —continue
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Press h to open a hovercard with more details.