New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Information regarding training/valid performance #2
Comments
Please read the referenced paper from GitHub, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04913 <https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04913>
Regards,
Danni Chen
UCLA SAMUELI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1600
www.samueli.ucla.edu <http://www.samueli.ucla.edu/>
… On Jul 17, 2020, at 7:29 AM, sidneyliang ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi! I hope you are doing well.
I have been searching for face attribute classifier and your one is the best I have found. I just wonder if it is possible for you to share some information regarding the dateset you used for training/validation and their corresponding performance (accuracy)?
Any related information would be much appreciated!
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3SGPB7FM6SUJG4NCBMIHLR4BN4TANCNFSM4O6LD5YQ>.
|
Got it, that is very helpful! I did not read the paper thoroughly enough. |
Hello @dchen236, have you trained the model from scratch on FairFace or did you use transfer learning? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi! I hope you are doing well.
I have been searching for face attribute classifier and your one is the best I have found. I just wonder if it is possible for you to share some information regarding the dateset you used for training/validation and their corresponding performance (accuracy)?
Any related information would be much appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: