Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2021. It is now read-only.

Changed polyline to work with a list of edges instead of a wire. #121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2015

Conversation

jmwright
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a rework of the polyline function to fix issue #102

If someone like @dcowden @hyOzd or @galou wants to look over my code, that would be great. Otherwise I'll just merge after waiting awhile for comments.

@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ def _findFromPoint(self, useLocalCoords=False):

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WARNING: only the last object in the stack is used.

@galou
Copy link

galou commented Oct 14, 2015

I make some comments because I don't know how to change the file directly.

@jmwright
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@galou I think you could fork my branch to make changes and then do a PR for that branch, but I'm not exactly sure how/if that works. The comments worked just fine though. Thank you for the feedback. I've incorporated your changes.

jmwright added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2015
Changed polyline to work with a list of edges instead of a wire.
@jmwright jmwright merged commit 5bda0e8 into master Oct 14, 2015
@galou
Copy link

galou commented Oct 15, 2015

@jmwright I also though I could fork the branch but I don't know how to avoid submitting a new PR when I want the changes to be integrated. I would rather reuse the same PR.

@jmwright jmwright deleted the polyline branch April 26, 2016 01:05
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants