Base class for Model objects #11

baank opened this Issue Oct 27, 2012 · 2 comments


None yet
2 participants

baank commented Oct 27, 2012

Just wondering whether there was a plan to have a base class for model objects:

e.g. User extends NoSQLModel.

Or if you definitely prefer having a normal POJO. I personally don't have an opinion either way.


deanhiller commented Oct 27, 2012

I am more KISS I get requests, I work on those ones first, so as you hit stuff like that or other stuff, just let me konw which ones you actually want. I am working on more features in @nosqlembeddable right now which I think could be more beneficial than Base class for Model objects.


deanhiller commented Dec 21, 2012

For this one, we will accept a pull request but we are realizing we have way too many other important features in the pipeline so I am closing this one. Feel free to do a pull request if you want though and we will pull it into our library.

@deanhiller deanhiller closed this Dec 21, 2012

easility added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2013

Merge pull request #11 from deanhiller/master
merging deanhiller with easility
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment