Dear Open Source Maintainers

[bkeepers]

We hear you and we're sorry. We've been slow to respond to your letter and slow to respond to your frustrations. Here is an update on what we're working on.

[trenton42]

👍

[trenton42]

👍

[gonmf]

Meanwhile no solution in sight for isaacs/github#253, which is much more fundamental and affects both small and large projects.

[sidewinder]

nice response!

[maguowei]

👍

[dsebastien]

👍

[jonocodes]

@Scellow This works well for me. https://userstyles.org/styles/37035/github-dark

[rhysd]

👍

[kevinchappell]

Excellent response, true Open Source class .

[Entalpi]

This is what we love, a sign that you are indeed listening. 👍

[bkeepers]

👍

[mourner]

😍 thank you, excited for the upcoming announcements!

[mourner]

😍 thank you, excited for the upcoming announcements!

[zackkatz]

👍

[zackkatz]

👍

[sotojuan]

They actually did it the absolute madmen (and women).

[sotojuan]

They actually did it the absolute madmen (and women).

[EGreg]

I wonder if GitHub itself can use its own issues system for prioritizing feature requests and bugs :-)

[EGreg]

I wonder if GitHub itself can use its own issues system for prioritizing feature requests and bugs :-)

[EGreg]

But, make it modifiable mostly by users who use github regularly, to avoid simple newbie misunderstandings.

[EGreg]

But, make it modifiable mostly by users who use github regularly, to avoid simple newbie misunderstandings.

[igorshubovych]

Should this be merged so everybody will see it in README?

[igorshubovych]

Should this be merged so everybody will see it in README?

[OmgImAlexis]

👍

[OmgImAlexis]

👍

[joshmanders]

@igorshubovych it's currently 645AM where @thejameskyle lives, when he's up and around he'll most likely merge it. Give it time. :)

[joshmanders]

@igorshubovych it's currently 645AM where @thejameskyle lives, when he's up and around he'll most likely merge it. Give it time. :)

[tvvocold]

👍

[tvvocold]

👍

[ElijahLynn]

+1 for the "We want to make sharing feedback with GitHub less of a black box experience and we want to hear your ideas and concerns regularly.".

[ElijahLynn]

+1 for the "We want to make sharing feedback with GitHub less of a black box experience and we want to hear your ideas and concerns regularly.".

[ghost]

👍

[ghost]

👍

[arturparkhisenko]

👍 We got feedback, yeah!

[arturparkhisenko]

👍 We got feedback, yeah!

[frknikiz]

👍

[frknikiz]

👍

[designnotdrum]

@EGreg I would imagine they do - in a private repo.

[designnotdrum]

@EGreg I would imagine they do - in a private repo.

[mkonicek]

Very cool! Please consider adding a Discussion tab: #44

[mkonicek]

Very cool! Please consider adding a Discussion tab: #44

[lmacsen]

👍 we'll spam you!

[lmacsen]

👍 we'll spam you!

[imkarthikk]

Thank you. Thank you so much Github.

[imkarthikk]

Thank you. Thank you so much Github.

[ianceicys]

Thank you Github. I'm looking forward to hearing more about what's on your radar and how you want to engage around the engineering investments you are making. I really like how the VSTS team are providing insight into their roadmap and I'd love to see Github provide something similiar.

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/bharry/2016/01/11/team-foundation-server-and-visual-studio-team-services-roadmap-update-2/

Keep up the good work and looking forward!

[ianceicys]

Thank you Github. I'm looking forward to hearing more about what's on your radar and how you want to engage around the engineering investments you are making. I really like how the VSTS team are providing insight into their roadmap and I'd love to see Github provide something similiar.

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/bharry/2016/01/11/team-foundation-server-and-visual-studio-team-services-roadmap-update-2/

Keep up the good work and looking forward!

[defaltd]

[defaltd]

[zschuessler]

👍

[zschuessler]

👍

[ephemeral]

👍

[ephemeral]

👍

[rdewolff]

Let's see what'll come next! 👍

[rdewolff]

Let's see what'll come next! 👍

[jwaldrip]

👍 Very nice!

[jwaldrip]

👍 Very nice!

[ghost]

[ghost]

[hastebrot]

👍

[hastebrot]

👍

[trenton42]

👍

[trenton42]

👍

[gonmf]

Meanwhile no solution in sight for isaacs/github#253, which is much more fundamental and affects both small and large projects.

[sidewinder]

nice response!

[maguowei]

👍

[dsebastien]

👍

[jonocodes]

@Scellow This works well for me. https://userstyles.org/styles/37035/github-dark

[rhysd]

👍

[kevinchappell]

Excellent response, true Open Source class .

[Entalpi]

This is what we love, a sign that you are indeed listening. 👍

[bkeepers]

👍

[mehmetkose]

👍

[mehmetkose]

👍

[cydrobolt]

👍

[cydrobolt]

👍

[wookoouk]

👍

[wookoouk]

👍

[gnagel]

👍

[gnagel]

👍

[gnagel]

👍

[gnagel]

👍

[rcliao]

👍

[rcliao]

👍

[mastercoms]

👍

[mastercoms]

👍

[erictherobot]

👍👍👍👍

[erictherobot]

👍👍👍👍

[vinimdocarmo]

👍

[vinimdocarmo]

👍

[aviau]

👍

[aviau]

👍

[bguzryanto]

Good to hear that!

[bguzryanto]

Good to hear that!

[yangwao]

👍

[yangwao]

👍

[Stephenitis]

so many 👍 creating a ton of vertical space...

[Stephenitis]

so many 👍 creating a ton of vertical space...

[jamiebuilds]

I'm sure I can speak for a lot of the original authors that we're very happy to receive this response. I'm eager to see GitHub start shipping things that make a real impact in our work.

PS: Damn you people with your +1's.

[jamiebuilds]

I'm sure I can speak for a lot of the original authors that we're very happy to receive this response. I'm eager to see GitHub start shipping things that make a real impact in our work.

PS: Damn you people with your +1's.