Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve and rename license #200

merged 3 commits into from Nov 11, 2016

Improve and rename license #200

merged 3 commits into from Nov 11, 2016


Copy link

@josepjaume josepjaume commented Nov 10, 2016

馃帺 What? Why?

This adds a missing piece to the license (taken from and renames it to LICENSE-AGPLv3.txt so GitHub automatically picks it up and shows it on the toolbar.

馃懟 GIF

Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 10, 2016

Current coverage is 97.47% (diff: 100%)

Merging #200 into master will not change coverage

@@             master       #200   diff @@
  Files           242        242          
  Lines          3729       3729          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
  Hits           3635       3635          
  Misses           94         94          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 32530ca...7b75786

Copy link

@oriolgual oriolgual left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also delete de MIT-LICENSE inside decidim-core? Should we also rename the LICENSE file inside each engine?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@oriolgual just did that.

@oriolgual oriolgual merged commit 545725c into master Nov 11, 2016
@oriolgual oriolgual deleted the improve_license branch November 11, 2016 14:20
aitorlb pushed a commit to CodiTramuntana/decidim that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2019

Don't display '#' if there is no hashtag
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants