Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add inch CI for tracking inline code docs #472

merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2017

Add inch CI for tracking inline code docs #472

merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2017


Copy link

@josepjaume josepjaume commented Jan 10, 2017

馃帺 What? Why?

This adds Inch CI, which tracks documentation coverage.

Example: This is how the report looks on this branch:

And that's the badge it generates: Inline docs

馃搶 Related Issues


馃搵 Subtasks


馃摲 Screenshots (optional)


馃懟 GIF

Copy link

@mention-bot mention-bot commented Jan 10, 2017

@josepjaume, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @divins, @oriolgual and @beagleknight to be potential reviewers.

Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Jan 10, 2017

Current coverage is 96.93% (diff: 100%)

Merging #472 into master will not change coverage

@@             master       #472   diff @@
  Files           234        234          
  Lines          3528       3528          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
  Hits           3420       3420          
  Misses          108        108          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 11c1237...506ed46

@josepjaume josepjaume merged commit eacd1a4 into master Jan 10, 2017
5 checks passed
@josepjaume josepjaume deleted the feature/add_inch branch Jan 10, 2017
aitorlb pushed a commit to CodiTramuntana/decidim that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants