Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GML temporal support #449

Merged
merged 19 commits into from Nov 11, 2014
Merged

Conversation

MrSnyder
Copy link
Contributor

This pull requests brings GML temporal types and temporal predicates into a working state:

  • Readers/writers for GML TimeObjects (gml:TimePeriod and gml:TimeInstant)
  • Treat TimeSlice and TimeObject structures as GML objects, not as generic XML structures
  • XPath evaluation on TimeSlices and TimeObjects
  • Activated parsing of Filter 2.0.0 temporal operators
  • In-memory evaluation of AnyInteracts temporal operator

MrSnyder and others added 19 commits November 10, 2014 17:43
…g and export of TimeInstants and TimePeriods
…ial XPath evaluation support for TimeInstant and TimePeriod objects
@MrSnyder MrSnyder added this to the 3.4 milestone Nov 11, 2014
@tfr42 tfr42 added enhancement enhancement or improvement feature feature and removed feature feature labels Nov 11, 2014
@MrSnyder MrSnyder added the ready label Nov 11, 2014
MrSnyder added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2014
@MrSnyder MrSnyder merged commit 606d749 into deegree:master Nov 11, 2014
@MrSnyder MrSnyder deleted the feature/gml-temporal-support branch November 11, 2014 16:15
@tfr42
Copy link
Member

tfr42 commented Nov 13, 2014

Thank you for your contribution. Your pull requests has been accepted by the TMC. Please find more information in the meeting chat available at http://wiki.deegree.org/deegreeWiki/TmcMeeting/TmcMeeting20141111.
This pull request will be part of the 3.4-pre16 release (unstable).

@tfr42 tfr42 added feature feature and removed enhancement enhancement or improvement labels Mar 4, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants