Skip to content

PIN number #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
zcater opened this issue Mar 5, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

PIN number #9

zcater opened this issue Mar 5, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@zcater
Copy link

zcater commented Mar 5, 2017

Personal Identification Number number is just wrong ;)

@denysvitali
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for opening this issue: I know it's "wrong", but it is common to say "PIN Number", at least in my latitudes.
What do you think about it? Should I change it?

@zcater
Copy link
Author

zcater commented Mar 5, 2017

I'm not a native English speaker but on the internet circles I play it's not seen very well.

@denysvitali
Copy link
Owner

Neither am I, but I know that some acronyms are used recursively (like ATM Machine, PIN Number, NFC Communication, ...)
I'll keep this open, hopefully a third person may give an advice on this: it is a nice language "bug" btw 😄

@silversquirl
Copy link

I'd change it to either "PIN code" or just "PIN". Technically speaking, "code" is redundant too (personal identification number code), but it's commonly used (moreso than "PIN number" in my experience) and, to me, sounds better.

@denysvitali
Copy link
Owner

PIN code sounds good! 👍

@denysvitali
Copy link
Owner

0cb748c fixes the issue, if you have something to add, feel free to comment here or open a new issue.

Have a wonderful day! 🚀

@Kadigan
Copy link

Kadigan commented Nov 15, 2023

I would say that "PIN number", despite being silly, may have actual merit.

And isn't that ironic that I'm the one saying this. But - hear me out.

The acronym (and many others like it in frequent general use, like "ATM") functionally encroaches on the proper noun territory, despite technically not being one. Due to this "overuse", it becomes progressively opaque. This leads to a situation where the acronym is not expanded at all (because it doesn't seem like something that needs to be understood), necessitating a qualifier ("number"). And so, we get "ATM machines" and "PIN numbers".

It seems that frequently-used acronyms may be too optimised, and our "language processors" in our brains optimise the optimisation out to retain other qualities of speech and meaning. And despite the horror it may induce in some, I see this as language adaptation at work. Which is generally a good thing.

I don't care if you change it or not - just thought I'd share my thoughts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants