Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Introduce Pull Request Labeler" #2234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2020
Merged

Conversation

3flex
Copy link
Member

@3flex 3flex commented Jan 9, 2020

Reverts #2228

See actions/labeler#12 - forks don't have permission to create labels on PRs in this repo, so it's not going to be useful in its current form unfortunately.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2234 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2234   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     81.37%   81.37%           
  Complexity     2073     2073           
=========================================
  Files           343      343           
  Lines          5981     5981           
  Branches       1086     1086           
=========================================
  Hits           4867     4867           
  Misses          532      532           
  Partials        582      582

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 483131d...956fb50. Read the comment docs.

@schalkms schalkms merged commit 4dc73ea into master Jan 10, 2020
@schalkms schalkms deleted the revert-2228-github-labeler branch January 10, 2020 06:27
@arturbosch arturbosch added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Jan 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants