Skip to content

Remove ignore:AppVeyor from codecov config #2540

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2020
Merged

Remove ignore:AppVeyor from codecov config #2540

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2020

Conversation

schalkms
Copy link
Member

@schalkms schalkms commented Mar 28, 2020

Since this repo migrated to GitHub Actions away from TravisCI and AppVeyor, the mentioned declaration is unnecessary.

Since this repo migrated to GitHub Actions away from TravisCI and AppVeyor, the mentioned declaration is unnecessary.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 28, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2540 into master will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2540   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     80.83%   80.83%           
  Complexity     2265     2265           
=========================================
  Files           376      376           
  Lines          7353     7353           
  Branches       1206     1206           
=========================================
  Hits           5944     5944           
  Misses          810      810           
  Partials        599      599           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 953c1a5...1316d65. Read the comment docs.

@arturbosch arturbosch merged commit 48577be into detekt:master Mar 28, 2020
@arturbosch arturbosch added this to the 1.7.2 milestone Mar 28, 2020
@schalkms schalkms deleted the codecov-conf branch March 28, 2020 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants