Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove duplicate MandatoryBracesLoops rule tests #2665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2020
Merged

Remove duplicate MandatoryBracesLoops rule tests #2665

merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2020

Conversation

schalkms
Copy link
Member

@schalkms schalkms commented May 9, 2020

Since both the types for and while use the same logic to detect missing braces, we don't need to duplicate all tests for both.

Since both the types for and while use the same logic to detect missing braces, we don't need to duplicate all tests for both.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2665 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2665   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     79.97%   79.97%           
  Complexity     2303     2303           
=========================================
  Files           380      380           
  Lines          6771     6771           
  Branches       1225     1225           
=========================================
  Hits           5415     5415           
  Misses          740      740           
  Partials        616      616           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1288153...9deac57. Read the comment docs.

@schalkms schalkms merged commit c712918 into detekt:master May 9, 2020
@arturbosch arturbosch added this to the 1.8.1 milestone May 10, 2020
@schalkms schalkms deleted the MandatoryBracesLoops branch May 15, 2020 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants