Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use configuration avoidance for withType usages #2672

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 11, 2020

Conversation

arturbosch
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@arturbosch arturbosch added this to the 1.9.0 milestone May 10, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 10, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2672 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2672   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     79.48%   79.48%           
  Complexity     2293     2293           
=========================================
  Files           380      380           
  Lines          6781     6781           
  Branches       1229     1229           
=========================================
  Hits           5390     5390           
  Misses          774      774           
  Partials        617      617           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3b078b1...55613bd. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@runningcode runningcode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@arturbosch
Copy link
Member Author

@runningcode thanks for pointing out the new API!

@arturbosch arturbosch merged commit b87e32a into master May 11, 2020
@arturbosch arturbosch deleted the conf-avoidance-withType branch May 11, 2020 20:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants