Workaround config - #3001
Merged
Merged
Conversation
arturbosch
reviewed
Aug 23, 2020
Member
Author
|
I think that we don't need to wrap it any where else. |
arturbosch
reviewed
Aug 24, 2020
arturbosch
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2020
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3001 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 79.78% 79.70% -0.09%
+ Complexity 2506 2504 -2
============================================
Files 427 427
Lines 7534 7543 +9
Branches 1420 1424 +4
============================================
+ Hits 6011 6012 +1
- Misses 767 773 +6
- Partials 756 758 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Right now we are using
FailFastConfigandDisabledAutoCorrectConfigto modify the configuration of all detekt and not just the configuration related with the rules itself.This is kind of complex because we have all those configurations mixed. We should think about this for 2.0.
I need this refactor to implement
--all-rules. Because I want to enable all the rules, but I don't want to enable any PostProcessor or Report. And all of them checks the same key:"active".I really don't like too much this code but I don't want to change any current behaviour.