Fix false positives for MultilineLambdaItParameter.kt

[chao2zhang]

This addresses #3449.

Notes:

• This rule now requires type-resolution to run in full mode. Without type-resolution, this rule would check only if it is used as explicit parameters.
• I have updated the tests to cover the scenario with type-resolution and without type-resolution.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3451 (0005d53) into master (fab88df) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3451      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     80.28%   80.26%   -0.02%     
- Complexity     2785     2788       +3     
============================================
  Files           454      454              
  Lines          8415     8427      +12     
  Branches       1609     1612       +3     
============================================
+ Hits           6756     6764       +8     
- Misses          787      789       +2     
- Partials        872      874       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...h/detekt/rules/style/MultilineLambdaItParameter.kt	85.71% <80.00%> (-5.96%)	9.00 <2.00> (+3.00)	⬇️
...ain/kotlin/io/github/detekt/metrics/LinesOfCode.kt	87.50% <0.00%> (-5.61%)	0.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fab88df...0005d53. Read the comment docs.

[BraisGabin]

Do we want more mixed rules? This one is kind of new. Shouldn't we just turn it in a pure type solving rule? The problem with mixed rules are the user expectations. Detekt seems buggy because of the mixed ones.

[chao2zhang]

Do we want more mixed rules? This one is kind of new. Shouldn't we just turn it in a pure type solving rule? The problem with mixed rules are the user expectations. Detekt seems buggy because of the mixed ones.

I remember reading some discussions but couldn't remember the resolution. I can change it to a full type-resolving rule.

[cortinico]

I can change it to a full type-resolving rule.

+1. We discussed about it in #2994