Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update assertj to v3.20.2 #3912

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2021
Merged

Update assertj to v3.20.2 #3912

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2021

Conversation

schalkms
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3912 (3eb0b10) into main (cd3836e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #3912   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     83.56%   83.56%           
  Complexity     3125     3125           
=========================================
  Files           456      456           
  Lines          9016     9016           
  Branches       1757     1757           
=========================================
  Hits           7534     7534           
  Misses          564      564           
  Partials        918      918           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cd3836e...3eb0b10. Read the comment docs.

@cortinico cortinico added this to the 1.18.0 milestone Jun 27, 2021
@cortinico cortinico added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jun 27, 2021
@schalkms schalkms merged commit 5fdfb8e into detekt:main Jun 27, 2021
@schalkms schalkms deleted the assertj branch June 27, 2021 21:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants