ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String> #5081

gouri-panda · 2022-07-15T18:37:30Z

closes: #5063

codecov · 2022-07-15T18:43:29Z

Codecov Report

Merging #5081 (caa95a9) into main (6bce28f) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

❗ Current head caa95a9 differs from pull request most recent head 1dc5b15. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1dc5b15 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #5081      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     84.87%   84.92%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     3575     3605      +30     
============================================
  Files           500      502       +2     
  Lines         11785    11876      +91     
  Branches       2197     2227      +30     
============================================
+ Hits          10002    10086      +84     
+ Misses          692      691       -1     
- Partials       1091     1099       +8

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...in/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/api/SplitPattern.kt	`92.59% <50.00%> (ø)`
...itlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt	`93.61% <100.00%> (+0.43%)`	⬆️
...io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/core/BindingContext.kt	`40.00% <0.00%> (-1.18%)`	⬇️
...lab/arturbosch/detekt/formatting/FormattingRule.kt	`97.87% <0.00%> (-0.09%)`	⬇️
.../arturbosch/detekt/formatting/wrappers/Wrapping.kt	`100.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...turbosch/detekt/formatting/wrappers/PackageName.kt	`100.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...rturbosch/detekt/rules/style/StyleGuideProvider.kt	`100.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...osch/detekt/formatting/wrappers/MultiLineIfElse.kt	`100.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...ch/detekt/formatting/wrappers/AnnotationSpacing.kt	`100.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...ch/detekt/formatting/wrappers/EnumEntryNameCase.kt	`100.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
... and 18 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6bce28f...1dc5b15. Read the comment docs.

cortinico · 2022-07-16T09:50:14Z

verify-generated-config-file is broken. Could you re-run ./gradlew generateDocumentation?

BraisGabin · 2022-07-16T10:00:14Z

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt

-    @Configuration("define a free-form comma separated list of function names to be ignored by this check")
-    private val excludedFunctions: SplitPattern by config("equals") { SplitPattern(it) }
+    @Configuration("define a list of function names to be ignored by this check")
+    private val excludedFunctions: List<String> by config(emptyList())


You are introducing a breaking change here. You should keep "equals".

And I don't know why the tests doesn't complain but looking at the code of SplitPattern this code doesn't do the same as before, right?

You are introducing a breaking change here. You should keep `"equals"

Ok

And I don't know why the tests doesn't complain but looking at the code of SplitPattern this code doesn't do the same as before, right?

Yes

@BraisGabin Should we change the SplitPattern implementation and leave the signature of ReturnCount as before i.e private val excludedFunctions: SplitPattern by config("equals") { SplitPattern(it) }?

Is this the right way to change?
ReturnCount.kt

private val excludedFunctions: SplitPattern by config(listOf("equals")) { SplitPattern(it.toString()) }

SplitPattern.kt

@Suppress("detekt.SpreadOperator") private val excludes = text .commaSeparatedPattern(*delimiters.toCharArray().map { it.toString() }.toTypedArray()) .mapIf(removeTrailingAsterisks) { seq -> seq.map { it.removePrefix("*") } .map { it.removeSuffix("*") } .map {it.removePrefix("[")} .map { it.removeSuffix("]") } } .toList()

I would look at what SplitPattern does and reproduce it in this rule. I'm sure that I did this time on other classes some time ago but for some reason I missed this one.

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt

BraisGabin · 2022-07-18T14:16:59Z

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt

@@ -1,14 +1,8 @@
+@file:Suppress("WildcardImport", "NoWildcardImports")


Don't use wildcard imports.

BraisGabin · 2022-07-18T14:19:28Z

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt

-    @Configuration("define a free-form comma separated list of function names to be ignored by this check")
-    private val excludedFunctions: SplitPattern by config("equals") { SplitPattern(it) }
+    @Configuration("define a list of function names to be ignored by this check")
+    private val excludedFunctions: SplitPattern by config(listOf("equals")) { SplitPattern(it.toString()) }


If you want to go this way you can use it.joinString(",") (or something similar, I can't recall the signature). This way you don't need to change SplitPattern. That could have unexpected implications.

BraisGabin · 2022-07-18T15:21:34Z

detekt-api/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/api/SplitPattern.kt

+    fun matches(value: String): List<String> =
+        excludes.filter { value.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) }


Reduce the changed lines

Suggested change

fun matches(value: String): List<String> =

excludes.filter { value.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) }

fun matches(value: String): List<String> = excludes.filter { value.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) }

BraisGabin · 2022-07-18T15:21:51Z

detekt-api/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/api/SplitPattern.kt

+    fun contains(value: String?): Boolean =
+        excludes.any { value?.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) == true }


Reduce the changed lines

Suggested change

fun contains(value: String?): Boolean =

excludes.any { value?.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) == true }

fun contains(value: String?): Boolean = excludes.any { value?.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) == true }

BraisGabin · 2022-07-18T15:22:27Z

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt

+        SplitPattern(
+            it.joinToString(
+                ","
+            )
+        )


Suggested change

SplitPattern(

it.joinToString(

","

)

)

SplitPattern(it.joinToString(","))

BraisGabin · 2022-07-18T15:23:03Z

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt

+    private fun shouldBeIgnored(function: KtNamedFunction) =
+        excludedFunctions.contains(function.name)


Reduce the changed lines

Suggested change

private fun shouldBeIgnored(function: KtNamedFunction) =

excludedFunctions.contains(function.name)

private fun shouldBeIgnored(function: KtNamedFunction) = excludedFunctions.contains(function.name)

github-actions bot added the rules label Jul 15, 2022

vercel bot deployed to Preview July 15, 2022 18:42 View deployment

BraisGabin reviewed Jul 16, 2022

View reviewed changes

gouri-panda force-pushed the fix-5063 branch from b120709 to 6604084 Compare July 18, 2022 12:58

vercel bot deployed to Preview July 18, 2022 13:05 View deployment

github-actions bot added the api label Jul 18, 2022

github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Jul 18, 2022

View reviewed changes

detekt-rules-style/src/main/kotlin/io/gitlab/arturbosch/detekt/rules/style/ReturnCount.kt Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed

gouri-panda force-pushed the fix-5063 branch from 6604084 to c3fef48 Compare July 18, 2022 13:35

vercel bot deployed to Preview July 18, 2022 13:44 View deployment

BraisGabin reviewed Jul 18, 2022

View reviewed changes

gouri-panda force-pushed the fix-5063 branch from c3fef48 to caa95a9 Compare July 18, 2022 14:55

gouri-panda requested a review from BraisGabin July 18, 2022 14:56

vercel bot deployed to Preview July 18, 2022 14:59 View deployment

BraisGabin approved these changes Jul 18, 2022

View reviewed changes

BraisGabin added this to the 1.22.0 milestone Jul 18, 2022

ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String>

1dc5b15

gouri-panda force-pushed the fix-5063 branch from caa95a9 to 1dc5b15 Compare July 18, 2022 15:31

github-actions bot removed the api label Jul 18, 2022

gouri-panda requested a review from BraisGabin July 18, 2022 15:32

vercel bot deployed to Preview July 18, 2022 15:36 View deployment

BraisGabin approved these changes Jul 23, 2022

View reviewed changes

BraisGabin merged commit 13d823c into detekt:main Jul 23, 2022

VitalyVPinchuk pushed a commit to VitalyVPinchuk/detekt that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022

ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String> (detekt#5081)

671b6a5

TWiStErRob mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2022

ReturnCount JSON Schema is outdated #5588

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String> #5081

ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String> #5081

gouri-panda commented Jul 15, 2022

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2022 •

edited

Loading

cortinico commented Jul 16, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 16, 2022

gouri-panda Jul 16, 2022

gouri-panda Jul 17, 2022

gouri-panda Jul 17, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

BraisGabin Jul 18, 2022

		@@ -1,14 +1,8 @@
		@file:Suppress("WildcardImport", "NoWildcardImports")

		fun matches(value: String): List<String> =
		excludes.filter { value.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) }

		fun contains(value: String?): Boolean =
		excludes.any { value?.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) == true }

	fun contains(value: String?): Boolean =
	excludes.any { value?.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) == true }
	fun contains(value: String?): Boolean = excludes.any { value?.contains(it, ignoreCase = true) == true }

		private fun shouldBeIgnored(function: KtNamedFunction) =
		excludedFunctions.contains(function.name)

ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String> #5081

ReturnCount.excludedFunctions should be a List<String> #5081

Conversation

gouri-panda commented Jul 15, 2022

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2022 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

cortinico commented Jul 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2022 •

edited

Loading