Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RedundantExplicitType add annotation @RequiresTypeResolution #5128

merged 1 commit into from Jul 25, 2022


Copy link

RedundantExplicitType uses type solving but it wasn't annotated with @RequiresTypeResolution

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5128 (64f1612) into main (e4a2bf5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #5128   +/-   ##
  Coverage     84.91%   84.91%           
  Complexity     3614     3614           
  Files           502      502           
  Lines         11887    11887           
  Branches       2237     2237           
  Hits          10094    10094           
  Misses          690      690           
  Partials       1103     1103           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rbosch/detekt/rules/style/RedundantExplicitType.kt 67.64% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e4a2bf5...64f1612. Read the comment docs.

3flex approved these changes Jul 25, 2022
@BraisGabin BraisGabin merged commit 8185f4e into main Jul 25, 2022
21 checks passed
@BraisGabin BraisGabin deleted the missing-annotation branch July 25, 2022 01:25
VitalyVPinchuk pushed a commit to VitalyVPinchuk/detekt that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants