Fix checkExhaustiveness for formatting and third party rules#5869
Merged
cortinico merged 1 commit intodetekt:mainfrom Mar 3, 2023
Merged
Fix checkExhaustiveness for formatting and third party rules#5869cortinico merged 1 commit intodetekt:mainfrom
cortinico merged 1 commit intodetekt:mainfrom
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5869 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 84.57% 84.57%
+ Complexity 3786 3785 -1
=========================================
Files 546 546
Lines 12938 12943 +5
Branches 2275 2274 -1
=========================================
+ Hits 10942 10947 +5
Misses 862 862
Partials 1134 1134
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
BraisGabin
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #5790
Sadly, I couldn't test this due to how classloading works with our setup.
Perhaps we can merge it and test @TWiStErRob repo against the SNAPSHOT?