New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to selenium 2.44.0 #399

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 26, 2014

Conversation

Projects
None yet
@asolntsev
Contributor

asolntsev commented Oct 25, 2014

@detro

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@detro

detro Oct 26, 2014

Owner

Awesome. Merging. Thanks :)

Owner

detro commented Oct 26, 2014

Awesome. Merging. Thanks :)

detro added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2014

@detro detro merged commit d57f72c into detro:master Oct 26, 2014

@bpmacedo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bpmacedo

bpmacedo Oct 29, 2014

Hi there!

Do u know when it'll be released?

Thx,
Bruno Macedo.

bpmacedo commented Oct 29, 2014

Hi there!

Do u know when it'll be released?

Thx,
Bruno Macedo.

@zch

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@zch

zch Oct 29, 2014

This closes issue #397, any idea when we can see a release with this fix?

zch commented Oct 29, 2014

This closes issue #397, any idea when we can see a release with this fix?

@robertoschwald

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@robertoschwald

robertoschwald Oct 30, 2014

Need that too, badly! Please release.

robertoschwald commented Oct 30, 2014

Need that too, badly! Please release.

@cch1

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cch1

cch1 Oct 30, 2014

Me Too!

cch1 commented Oct 30, 2014

Me Too!

@asolntsev asolntsev deleted the asolntsev:upgrade-to-selenium-2-44 branch Oct 30, 2014

@inka

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@inka

inka Nov 4, 2014

+1 for releasing that stuff please!

inka commented Nov 4, 2014

+1 for releasing that stuff please!

@andresriancho

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@andresriancho

andresriancho Nov 5, 2014

Will you guys release it as part of the npm package ? When? This is a critical fix!

andresriancho commented Nov 5, 2014

Will you guys release it as part of the npm package ? When? This is a critical fix!

@mikx

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mikx

mikx Nov 7, 2014

Please release this fix!

mikx commented Nov 7, 2014

Please release this fix!

@iceone23

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@iceone23

iceone23 Nov 9, 2014

Great! I hope fixed release will be soon.

iceone23 commented Nov 9, 2014

Great! I hope fixed release will be soon.

@adlenafane

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adlenafane

adlenafane commented Nov 9, 2014

👍

@kpiwko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kpiwko

kpiwko Nov 10, 2014

Same here, waiting for new release to integrate it with Arquillian Drone.

kpiwko commented Nov 10, 2014

Same here, waiting for new release to integrate it with Arquillian Drone.

@drdozer

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@drdozer

drdozer Nov 13, 2014

This is a showstopper for me. A release with this in would be good to have ;D

drdozer commented Nov 13, 2014

This is a showstopper for me. A release with this in would be good to have ;D

@acdcjunior

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@acdcjunior

acdcjunior Nov 16, 2014

For those of you who don't mind a temporary hack (like me), just add this class to your (Java) project:

package org.openqa.selenium.browserlaunchers;
import org.openqa.selenium.Capabilities;
import org.openqa.selenium.Proxy;
public class Proxies {
    public static Proxy extractProxy(Capabilities capabilities) {
        return Proxy.extractFrom(capabilities);
    }
}

And it should get back working (or at least it did for me).
My setup is:

  • org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-remote-driver:2.44.0 and org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-server:2.44.0 (declared above the dependencies below, because ghostdriver is overriding them with 2.39.0)
  • org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-java:2.44.0
  • com.github.detro.ghostdriver:phantomjsdriver:1.1.0
  • phantomjs.exe version 1.9.7 under windows 8.

(If my ghostdriver/phantomjs.exe pairing is wrong, please let me know -- I really find this versioning confusing, that's why I'm not using 1.2.0 yet: I can't figure out, within my attention span, if it is released and should be used or not.)

acdcjunior commented Nov 16, 2014

For those of you who don't mind a temporary hack (like me), just add this class to your (Java) project:

package org.openqa.selenium.browserlaunchers;
import org.openqa.selenium.Capabilities;
import org.openqa.selenium.Proxy;
public class Proxies {
    public static Proxy extractProxy(Capabilities capabilities) {
        return Proxy.extractFrom(capabilities);
    }
}

And it should get back working (or at least it did for me).
My setup is:

  • org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-remote-driver:2.44.0 and org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-server:2.44.0 (declared above the dependencies below, because ghostdriver is overriding them with 2.39.0)
  • org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-java:2.44.0
  • com.github.detro.ghostdriver:phantomjsdriver:1.1.0
  • phantomjs.exe version 1.9.7 under windows 8.

(If my ghostdriver/phantomjs.exe pairing is wrong, please let me know -- I really find this versioning confusing, that's why I'm not using 1.2.0 yet: I can't figure out, within my attention span, if it is released and should be used or not.)

@iceone23

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@iceone23

iceone23 Nov 16, 2014

Thank you, Antonio! That work for me :)
But then I get another error:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/common/base/Function
    at org.leospammer.phantomjs.ExampleScenario.main(ExampleScenario.java:23)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.google.common.base.Function
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
    at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
    ... 1 more

iceone23 commented Nov 16, 2014

Thank you, Antonio! That work for me :)
But then I get another error:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/common/base/Function
    at org.leospammer.phantomjs.ExampleScenario.main(ExampleScenario.java:23)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.google.common.base.Function
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
    at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
    at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
    at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
    at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
    ... 1 more

@acdcjunior

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@acdcjunior

acdcjunior Nov 16, 2014

@iceone23 I don't mean to bring this thread into off-topic madness, but just to comment on your last error, it seems like a Guava/GoogleCollections dependency is having its version number overridden. Keep in mind selenium-firefox-driver:2.44.0 requires selenium-remote-driver:2.44.0 that in turn requires guava:18.0, so it may be shadowing some older Guava/GoogleCollections version your project depended on.

acdcjunior commented Nov 16, 2014

@iceone23 I don't mean to bring this thread into off-topic madness, but just to comment on your last error, it seems like a Guava/GoogleCollections dependency is having its version number overridden. Keep in mind selenium-firefox-driver:2.44.0 requires selenium-remote-driver:2.44.0 that in turn requires guava:18.0, so it may be shadowing some older Guava/GoogleCollections version your project depended on.

@wakaleo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@wakaleo

wakaleo Nov 19, 2014

+1 We need this for Serenity as well.

wakaleo commented Nov 19, 2014

+1 We need this for Serenity as well.

@TikhomirovSergey

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TikhomirovSergey

TikhomirovSergey Nov 19, 2014

+1. I am waiting for this fix.

TikhomirovSergey commented Nov 19, 2014

+1. I am waiting for this fix.

@mgijsberti

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mgijsberti

mgijsberti Nov 19, 2014

+1 for this issue to be fixed.

mgijsberti commented Nov 19, 2014

+1 for this issue to be fixed.

@xdamman

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@xdamman

xdamman commented Nov 20, 2014

+1

@edwolb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@edwolb

edwolb commented Nov 27, 2014

+1

@typekpb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@typekpb

typekpb commented Nov 28, 2014

+1

@chino23

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chino23

chino23 commented Dec 2, 2014

+1

amesbah added a commit to crawljax/crawljax that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2014

@amesbah

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@amesbah

amesbah Dec 3, 2014

Are there any plans to release this important fix in Maven any time soon?

amesbah commented Dec 3, 2014

Are there any plans to release this important fix in Maven any time soon?

@asolntsev

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@asolntsev

asolntsev Dec 4, 2014

Contributor

Hi all!
I have published patched PhantomJS in our Maven repo. Feel free to use it until the official PhantomJS is released:

<dependency>
    <groupId>com.codeborne</groupId>
    <artifactId>phantomjsdriver</artifactId>
    <version>1.2.1</version>
</dependency>

This version is PhantomJS 1.2.0 patched for working with Selenium 2.44.0

Contributor

asolntsev commented Dec 4, 2014

Hi all!
I have published patched PhantomJS in our Maven repo. Feel free to use it until the official PhantomJS is released:

<dependency>
    <groupId>com.codeborne</groupId>
    <artifactId>phantomjsdriver</artifactId>
    <version>1.2.1</version>
</dependency>

This version is PhantomJS 1.2.0 patched for working with Selenium 2.44.0

@amesbah

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@amesbah

amesbah Dec 4, 2014

Fantastic! Thanks.

amesbah commented Dec 4, 2014

Fantastic! Thanks.

@craig-forster-sp

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@craig-forster-sp

craig-forster-sp commented Dec 10, 2014

+1

laurelnaiad added a commit to marklogic/marklogic-samplestack that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2014

e2e: force protractor to use selenium 2.43.1
This is the last version of selenium compatible with PhantomJS until
PhantomJS/Ghostdriver is updated. On postinstall of the application,
modify protractor configuration to use 2.43.1.

Watch for detro/ghostdriver#399 to be included
in a released version and then undo this.
@jvanderwee

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jvanderwee

jvanderwee commented Jan 5, 2015

+1

@nottoseethesun

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@nottoseethesun

nottoseethesun Jan 23, 2015

+1 - what andresriancho said.

nottoseethesun commented Jan 23, 2015

+1 - what andresriancho said.

@KabanaSoft

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@KabanaSoft

KabanaSoft Jan 24, 2015

Guys,

I'm trying to get a fix in place until an official release is made and am a little confused as to how to tell PhantomJs to use specific ghostdriver that contains the fix. I have grabbed the latest ghostdriver source from master and also downloaded the 1.2.1 fix mentioned by @asolntsev from here: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.codeborne/phantomjsdriver/1.2.1.

I am using C# WebDriver bindings, running a selenium server 2.44.0 and PhantomJs 1.9.8. From my understanding PhantomJs has an old ghostdriver embedded into it that doesn't contain a fix for this issue, but you can override that using the phantomjs.ghostdriver.path option (i read this here: https://github.com/detro/ghostdriver/blob/master/README.md). I have tried using the following code to specify the custom ghostdriver path:

capabilities.SetCapability("phantomjs.ghostdriver.path", @"C:\ghostdriver-master\src\main.js");

I have tried many different options as well as pointing to the phantomjsdriver-1.2.1.jar file that i downloaded and still can't get it to work.

Do you have any suggestions on how i can get PhantomJs to use the updated ghostdriver that has this fix implemented? (i think im a little confused on exactly how to use this setting)

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

KabanaSoft commented Jan 24, 2015

Guys,

I'm trying to get a fix in place until an official release is made and am a little confused as to how to tell PhantomJs to use specific ghostdriver that contains the fix. I have grabbed the latest ghostdriver source from master and also downloaded the 1.2.1 fix mentioned by @asolntsev from here: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.codeborne/phantomjsdriver/1.2.1.

I am using C# WebDriver bindings, running a selenium server 2.44.0 and PhantomJs 1.9.8. From my understanding PhantomJs has an old ghostdriver embedded into it that doesn't contain a fix for this issue, but you can override that using the phantomjs.ghostdriver.path option (i read this here: https://github.com/detro/ghostdriver/blob/master/README.md). I have tried using the following code to specify the custom ghostdriver path:

capabilities.SetCapability("phantomjs.ghostdriver.path", @"C:\ghostdriver-master\src\main.js");

I have tried many different options as well as pointing to the phantomjsdriver-1.2.1.jar file that i downloaded and still can't get it to work.

Do you have any suggestions on how i can get PhantomJs to use the updated ghostdriver that has this fix implemented? (i think im a little confused on exactly how to use this setting)

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

@luksch

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@luksch

luksch Jan 29, 2015

+1

Is there a problem with releasing this? I am still waiting desperately.

BTW: Thanks you all for the work you put into this. My work could not be with selenium, phantomjs and the awesome ghostdriver.

luksch commented Jan 29, 2015

+1

Is there a problem with releasing this? I am still waiting desperately.

BTW: Thanks you all for the work you put into this. My work could not be with selenium, phantomjs and the awesome ghostdriver.

@Robinfr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Robinfr

Robinfr Feb 27, 2015

+1 for releasing this.

Robinfr commented Feb 27, 2015

+1 for releasing this.

@kpiwko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kpiwko

kpiwko Mar 2, 2015

Just as future note, Arquillian Drone and Graphene is migrating to com.codeborne fork. Selenium 2.45.0 was released recently and this issue takes 6 month to be released. Thanks @asolntsev for making that possible!

kpiwko commented Mar 2, 2015

Just as future note, Arquillian Drone and Graphene is migrating to com.codeborne fork. Selenium 2.45.0 was released recently and this issue takes 6 month to be released. Thanks @asolntsev for making that possible!

@rck109d

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rck109d

rck109d commented Mar 11, 2015

+1

@lambrojos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lambrojos

lambrojos commented Mar 16, 2015

+1

@automatictester

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@automatictester

automatictester commented Mar 29, 2015

+1

@lucaspouzac

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lucaspouzac

lucaspouzac commented Apr 7, 2015

+1 :)

@djeikyb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@djeikyb

djeikyb Apr 16, 2015

I'm not sure if I can trust @asolntsev. @kpiwko vouches for him, claiming the arquillian stuff is switching to his fork. But I don't know of @kpiwko either. You can verify this claim following transitive dependencies:

  1. https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-graphene/blob/87dd6253329ed55801ebcb955431b89aba9645bf/pom.xml
  2. https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-drone/blob/8b54eb8915d217e1028fc82631fd966903c27fa2/drone-bom/pom.xml
  3. https://github.com/qa/arquillian-phantom-driver/blob/c86f2749f8a99e1ed4233049c211a691d71d38ef/pom.xml

@kpiwko is apparently a RedHat employee, and you can see his contributions on this site. Since his claim checks out, it seems reasonable to transitively trust @asolntsev.

Just thought I'd mention this in case anyone else was a little hesitant to start using the @asolntsev fork.

djeikyb commented Apr 16, 2015

I'm not sure if I can trust @asolntsev. @kpiwko vouches for him, claiming the arquillian stuff is switching to his fork. But I don't know of @kpiwko either. You can verify this claim following transitive dependencies:

  1. https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-graphene/blob/87dd6253329ed55801ebcb955431b89aba9645bf/pom.xml
  2. https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-drone/blob/8b54eb8915d217e1028fc82631fd966903c27fa2/drone-bom/pom.xml
  3. https://github.com/qa/arquillian-phantom-driver/blob/c86f2749f8a99e1ed4233049c211a691d71d38ef/pom.xml

@kpiwko is apparently a RedHat employee, and you can see his contributions on this site. Since his claim checks out, it seems reasonable to transitively trust @asolntsev.

Just thought I'd mention this in case anyone else was a little hesitant to start using the @asolntsev fork.

@asolntsev

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@asolntsev

asolntsev Apr 16, 2015

Contributor

Hi Djeikyb!

What i like about open-source development is that you don't need to
trust me. The only think in the World you can trust is the code. You
can just compare original phantomjs code and my fork and verify that
there is no more difference but the few required lines of code.

Sincerely yours,
@asolntsev

2015-04-16 16:06 GMT+08:00, djeikyb notifications@github.com:

I'm not sure if I can trust @asolntsev. @kpiwko vouches for him, claiming
the arquillian stuff is switching to his fork. But I don't know of @kpiwko
either. You can verify this claim following transitive dependencies:

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-graphene/blob/87dd6253329ed55801ebcb955431b89aba9645bf/pom.xml

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-drone/blob/8b54eb8915d217e1028fc82631fd966903c27fa2/drone-bom/pom.xml

https://github.com/qa/arquillian-phantom-driver/blob/c86f2749f8a99e1ed4233049c211a691d71d38ef/pom.xml

@kpiwko is apparently a RedHat employee, and you can see his contributions
on this site. Since his claim checks out, it seems reasonable to
transitively trust @asolntsev.

Just thought I'd mention this in case anyone else was a little hesitant to
start using the @asolntsev fork.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#399 (comment)

Andrei Solntsev

Contributor

asolntsev commented Apr 16, 2015

Hi Djeikyb!

What i like about open-source development is that you don't need to
trust me. The only think in the World you can trust is the code. You
can just compare original phantomjs code and my fork and verify that
there is no more difference but the few required lines of code.

Sincerely yours,
@asolntsev

2015-04-16 16:06 GMT+08:00, djeikyb notifications@github.com:

I'm not sure if I can trust @asolntsev. @kpiwko vouches for him, claiming
the arquillian stuff is switching to his fork. But I don't know of @kpiwko
either. You can verify this claim following transitive dependencies:

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-graphene/blob/87dd6253329ed55801ebcb955431b89aba9645bf/pom.xml

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-drone/blob/8b54eb8915d217e1028fc82631fd966903c27fa2/drone-bom/pom.xml

https://github.com/qa/arquillian-phantom-driver/blob/c86f2749f8a99e1ed4233049c211a691d71d38ef/pom.xml

@kpiwko is apparently a RedHat employee, and you can see his contributions
on this site. Since his claim checks out, it seems reasonable to
transitively trust @asolntsev.

Just thought I'd mention this in case anyone else was a little hesitant to
start using the @asolntsev fork.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#399 (comment)

Andrei Solntsev

@luksch

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@luksch

luksch Apr 16, 2015

@asolntsev do you have any knowledge about what actaully happened to this repo here? I mean why it is abandoned? Maybe there should be a message in the readme.me telling people that this repo is not maintained any more.

luksch commented Apr 16, 2015

@asolntsev do you have any knowledge about what actaully happened to this repo here? I mean why it is abandoned? Maybe there should be a message in the readme.me telling people that this repo is not maintained any more.

@erdi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@erdi

erdi Apr 16, 2015

Contributor

This repo doesn't look abandoned, @detro has made a commit 9hrs ago. There simply are no new releases for some reason...

Contributor

erdi commented Apr 16, 2015

This repo doesn't look abandoned, @detro has made a commit 9hrs ago. There simply are no new releases for some reason...

@luksch

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@luksch

luksch Apr 16, 2015

That is good news! interesting timing for the first commit since November :) I would be more than glad if @detro continues his wonderful work!

luksch commented Apr 16, 2015

That is good news! interesting timing for the first commit since November :) I would be more than glad if @detro continues his wonderful work!

@asolntsev

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@asolntsev

asolntsev Apr 16, 2015

Contributor

Yes,
some months ago @detro wrote that he is not able to support the project anymore, and asked for volunteers. I guess he found somebody.

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "luksch" notifications@github.com
To: "detro/ghostdriver" ghostdriver@noreply.github.com
Cc: "Andrei Solntsev" andrei.solntsev@gmail.com
Subject: [ghostdriver] Upgrade to selenium 2.44.0 (#399)
Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2015 02:01

@asolntsev do you have any knowledge about what actaully happened to this repo here? I mean why it is abandoned? Maybe there should be a message in the readme.me telling people that this repo is not maintained any more.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Contributor

asolntsev commented Apr 16, 2015

Yes,
some months ago @detro wrote that he is not able to support the project anymore, and asked for volunteers. I guess he found somebody.

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "luksch" notifications@github.com
To: "detro/ghostdriver" ghostdriver@noreply.github.com
Cc: "Andrei Solntsev" andrei.solntsev@gmail.com
Subject: [ghostdriver] Upgrade to selenium 2.44.0 (#399)
Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2015 02:01

@asolntsev do you have any knowledge about what actaully happened to this repo here? I mean why it is abandoned? Maybe there should be a message in the readme.me telling people that this repo is not maintained any more.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@GrayedFox

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GrayedFox

GrayedFox Jul 14, 2015

This would resolve so many headaches on my end!!! +1 to release this asap.

GrayedFox commented Jul 14, 2015

This would resolve so many headaches on my end!!! +1 to release this asap.

@jeffnyman

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jeffnyman

jeffnyman Nov 30, 2015

Just chiming in as others have done to see if a release is going to happen. If not, okay, but then let's make that abundantly clear to everyone. Incidentally, I came here via this ticket (#397). I'm using the solution provided there by @asolntsev and it's working fine.

Given that the "GhostDriver needs a proper maintainer" text is still on the readme, I'm guessing that a proper maintainer has not yet been found?

jeffnyman commented Nov 30, 2015

Just chiming in as others have done to see if a release is going to happen. If not, okay, but then let's make that abundantly clear to everyone. Incidentally, I came here via this ticket (#397). I'm using the solution provided there by @asolntsev and it's working fine.

Given that the "GhostDriver needs a proper maintainer" text is still on the readme, I'm guessing that a proper maintainer has not yet been found?

@patrik7 patrik7 referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2017

Closed

Unable to use with scala 2.11 #8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment