Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use CINC (instead of InSpec 4) #212

Closed
mcgege opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

Use CINC (instead of InSpec 4) #212

mcgege opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 7 comments

Comments

@mcgege
Copy link
Member

mcgege commented Jun 3, 2019

At the moment we stick to version 3, as there are some license issues with v4. In addition the deprecation warnings in the baselines should be solved first.

See dev-sec/linux-baseline#115 and dev-sec/apache-baseline#31

@mcgege
Copy link
Member Author

mcgege commented Oct 4, 2019

And also see if the fix for faraday (#228) can be removed then

@mcgege
Copy link
Member Author

mcgege commented Jan 15, 2020

There is now an open source alternative: CINC
We should try to go in this direction instead of InSpec 4

@mcgege mcgege changed the title Use InSpec 4 Use CINC (instead of InSpec 4) Jan 15, 2020
@mcgege mcgege removed the blocked label Jan 15, 2020
@aaronlippold
Copy link
Member

aaronlippold commented Jan 15, 2020 via email

@mcgege
Copy link
Member Author

mcgege commented Jan 15, 2020

Right, the cinc-auditor is the substitution for inspec ... but both is hosted on this webpage / project

@timstoop
Copy link
Contributor

timstoop commented Jan 16, 2020

Slightly off topic, but what's wrong with inspec 4 exactly? Seems to be an Apache license, according to Github: https://github.com/inspec/inspec/blob/master/LICENSE

Never mind, found it. Things like this: https://twitter.com/nellshamrell/status/1136333909577281536

@chris-rock
Copy link
Member

chris-rock commented Jan 16, 2020

Once the Cinc Auditor is approved by Chef, we will be able to switch to the latest version again

@mcgege
Copy link
Member Author

mcgege commented Feb 10, 2021

fixed by #238

@mcgege mcgege closed this as completed Feb 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants