Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upGetting best mileage with `typeWith`? #83
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Yes, I agree that this is worth supporting |
Gabriel439
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2017
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Closing, as I think this is fixed by #84 |
Gabriel439
closed this
Jul 5, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
aleator commentedJul 3, 2017
I'm playing with Dhall (probably in ways it wasn't supposed to be used) and I'm having troubles with the
typeWithfunction. What I would want is to have few opaque type name that can be referred to in my config. For most part this works fine, except thatloaddoes typechecking. This means that I cannot refer to my opaque types in anything that has been imported.The above is probably by design, but it certainly makes
typeWithless useful for the end user. Would a patch that enables passing type context intoloadbe acceptable?