Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Can we drop the mandatory type annotations on Optional and List? #73
Hmm. Type inference is very CPU intensive and it’s not trivial to implement efficiently. That said, dhall isn’t turing-complete, so there may be some really easy way to do type inference that I don’t know of. What’s there in the literature?…
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:07 PM Oliver Charles ***@***.***> wrote: I see now that this is really to drive the typing judgement because you don't do inference. One question is to first ask if that's set in stone, or would we be open to adding some type inference? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#73 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALNBJ0YFeft5yQ4ZcL2eOjpPFF0tMZHfks5tR3uNgaJpZM4RjlOC> .