We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When running this test from SRFI-78's examples:
(check-ec (:range e 100) (:let x (expt 2.0 e)) (= (+ x 1) x) => #f (e x))
I get:
Error: unbound variable: check:proc-ec Call history: <syntax> (##core#if #t (and433 (not164 stop125)) #f) <syntax> (and433 (not164 stop125)) <syntax> (not164 stop125) <syntax> (loop169 (|+160| e 1)) <syntax> (|+160| e 1) <syntax> (##core#undefined) <syntax> (##core#undefined) <syntax> (##core#let () loop169) <syntax> (##core#begin loop169) <syntax> (##core#undefined) <syntax> (##core#undefined) <eval> (>=78 check:mode79 1) <eval> (check:proc80 (quote81 (+ 1 1)) (lambda82 () (+ 1 1)) equal?75 2) <eval> (+ 1 1) <eval> (>=91 check:mode92 1) <eval> (check:proc-ec93 (let94 ((cases95 0)) (let94 ((w96 (first-ec97 #f (nested84 (|:range| e 100) (|:let|... <--
This is the same problem as in issue 7, only with check:proc-ec.
check:proc-ec
The fix should be the same too: (export (check check:proc-ec))
(export (check check:proc-ec))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix for Issue 8
2fd7870
#8
No branches or pull requests
When running this test from SRFI-78's examples:
I get:
This is the same problem as in issue 7, only with
check:proc-ec.The fix should be the same too:
(export (check check:proc-ec))The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: