New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing to compile diesel_codegen-0.5.4 on rust nightly 2016-04-19 #292

Closed
Cottonwoods opened this Issue Apr 20, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@Cottonwoods

Cottonwoods commented Apr 20, 2016

Hope this is the right place to report this: failing the compilation of included library diesel_codegen with error: attempted access of field node on type &syntax::ast::StructField, but no field with that name was found in attr.rs

This is when I try to build diesel_demo. I tried to compile on stable 2016-04-11 with --no-default-features --features with-syntex & get mismatched types from build.rs instead: expected &mut syntex::Registry, found &mut main::syntex::Registry

Cargo versions were 0.11.0 & 0.9.0 respectively. Let me know if I need to include any more information.

Thanks

@sgrif

This comment has been minimized.

Member

sgrif commented Apr 21, 2016

The officially supported nightly version for 0.5.4 was nightly-2016-03-11. Please update to 0.6.1 to use with nightly-2016-04-09 or later (syntex 0.31.0)

@sgrif sgrif closed this Apr 21, 2016

@sgrif

This comment has been minimized.

Member

sgrif commented Apr 21, 2016

I need to update diesel_demo now that it's dependencies are updated... Will report back when it's done

@sgrif

This comment has been minimized.

Member

sgrif commented Apr 21, 2016

diesel_demo should be up to date.

@sgrif

This comment has been minimized.

Member

sgrif commented Apr 21, 2016

The getting started guide on diesel.rs should be up to date.

@sgrif

This comment has been minimized.

Member

sgrif commented Apr 21, 2016

Let me know if you have any more issues. :)

@Cottonwoods

This comment has been minimized.

Cottonwoods commented Apr 21, 2016

Sounds good, thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment