Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upTest custom_derive integration #393
Comments
killercup
added
help wanted
good first issue
labels
Aug 1, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
|
I'd like to work on this one. |
This comment has been minimized.
|
@shssoichiro Oh! You might want to hold off on this one right now. There are known bugs when using |
This comment has been minimized.
|
Got it! I'll check back later if this still ends up being necessary. |
This comment has been minimized.
|
Closing as it turns out custom-derive is completely broken and we're just going to remove it from the docs now that Macros 1.1 is a thing. |
sgrif
closed this
Sep 12, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
killercup commentedAug 1, 2016
Many of the
macro_rules!macros can be used with the custom_derive crate, e.g.BelongsTo!orIdentifiable!. This is documented, by not tested.We should (as a first step) add custom_derive as a dev dependency and expand the documentation code blocks to actually work as doc tests.