Authlogic is a clean, simple, and unobtrusive ruby authentication solution. Put simply, its the Chuck Norris of authentication solutions for your framework of choice.
So what is Authlogic, and why would I create a solution to a problem that already has plenty of solutions? Because none of the current solutions feel right. The feel wrong because logic is not organized properly in the MVC structure. As you may know, a common misconception with the MVC design pattern is that the model “M” is only for data access logic, which is wrong. A model is a place for domain logic. This is why the RESTful design pattern and the current authentication solutions don't play nice, because the logic is not in the right spot. Authlogic solves this by placing the session maintenance logic into its own domain (aka “model”), where it belongs. Moving session maintenance into its own domain has its benefits:
It's easier to update and stay current with the latest security practices. Since authlogic sits in between you and your session it can assist in keeping your security top notch. Such as upgrading your hashing algorithm, helping you transition to a new algorithm, etc. Also, Authlogic is a gem, which means you get all of these benefits easily, through a rubygems update.
It ties everything together on the domain level. Take a new user registration for example, no reason to manually log the user in, authlogic handles this for you via callbacks. The same applies to a user changing their password. Authlogic handles maintaining the session for you.
Your application can stay clean and focused and free of redundant authentication code from app to app. Meaning generators are NOT necessary at all.
A byproduct of #3 is that you don't have to test the same code over and over in each of your apps. You don't test the internals of ActiveRecord in each of your apps, so why would you test the internals of Authlogic? It's already been thoroughly tested for you. Focus on your application, and get rid of the noise by testing your application specific code and not generated code that you didn't write.
You get to write your own code, just like you do for any other model. Meaning the code you write is specific to your application, the way you want it, and more importantly you understand it.
You are not restricted to a single session. Think about Apple's me.com, where they need you to authenticate a second time before changing your billing information. Why not just create a second session for this? It works just like your initial session. Then your billing controller can require an “ultra secure” session.
Authlogic can do all of this and much more, keep reading to see…
Let's take a rails application…
What if creating a user session could be as simple as…
What if your user sessions controller could look just like your other controllers…
class UserSessionsController < ApplicationController def new @user_session = UserSession.new end def create @user_session = UserSession.new(params[:user_session]) if @user_session.save redirect_to account_url else render :action => :new end end def destroy current_user_session.destroy redirect_to new_user_session_url end end
Look familiar? If you didn't know any better, you would think UserSession was an ActiveRecord model. I think that's pretty cool, because it fits nicely into the RESTful development pattern, a style we all know and love. What about the view…
<% form_for @user_session do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages %> <%= f.label :login %><br /> <%= f.text_field :login %><br /> <br /> <%= f.label :password %><br /> <%= f.password_field :password %><br /> <br /> <%= f.submit "Login" %> <% end %>
Or how about persisting the session…
class ApplicationController helper_method :current_user_session, :current_user private def current_user_session return @current_user_session if defined?(@current_user_session) @current_user_session = UserSession.find end def current_user return @current_user if defined?(@current_user) @current_user = current_user_session && current_user_session.user end end
* Documentation: authlogic.rubyforge.org * Tutorial: Authlogic basic setup: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/3/tutorial-authlogic-basic-setup * Tutorial: Reset passwords with Authlogic the RESTful way: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/16/tutorial-reset-passwords-with-authlogic * Tutorial: Using OpenID with Authlogic: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/21/tutorial-using-openid-with-authlogic * Live example of the tutorials above (with source): authlogicexample.binarylogic.com * Tutorial: Easily migrate from restful_authentication: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/23/tutorial-easily-migrate-from-restful_authentication-to-authlogic * Tutorial: Upgrade passwords easily with Authlogic: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/23/tutorial-upgrade-passwords-easily-with-authlogic
Bugs / feature suggestions: binarylogic.lighthouseapp.com/projects/18752-authlogic
Google group: groups.google.com/group/authlogic
If you find a bug or a problem please post it on lighthouse. If you need help with something or it is specific to your app, please use google groups. I check both regularly and get emails when anything happens, so that is the best place to get help.
Install the gem / plugin (recommended)
$ sudo gem install authlogic
Now add the gem dependency in your config:
# config/environment.rb config.gem "authlogic"
Or you install this as a plugin (for older versions of rails)
script/plugin install git://github.com/binarylogic/authlogic.git
Lets assume you are setting up a session for your User model.
Create your user_session.rb file:
$ script/generate session user_session
This will create a file that looks similar to:
# app/models/user_session.rb class UserSession < Authlogic::Session::Base # configuration here, just like ActiveRecord, or in an initializer # See Authlogic::Session::Config::ClassMethods for more details end
The user model needs to have the following columns. The names of these columns can be changed with configuration. Better yet, Authlogic tries to guess these names by checking for the existence of common names. See Authlogic::Session::Config::ClassMethods for more details, but chances are you won't have to specify any configuration for your field names, even if they aren't the same names as below.
t.string :login, :null => false t.string :crypted_password, :null => false t.string :password_salt, :null => false t.string :persistence_token, :null => false t.string :single_access_token, :null => false # optional, see the tokens section below. t.string :perishable_token, :null => false # optional, see the tokens section below. t.integer :login_count, :null => false, :default => 0 # optional, this is a "magic" column, see the magic columns section below
Make sure you have a model that you will be authenticating with. For this example let's say you have a User model:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_authentic # for options see documentation: Authlogic::ORMAdapters::ActiveRecordAdapter::ActsAsAuthentic::Config end
One thing to keep in mind here is that the default :crypto_provider for Authlogic is Sha512. You are NOT forced to use this. See the encryption methods section below for more information.
You are all set, now go use it just like you would with any other ActiveRecord model. Either glance at the code at the beginning of this README or check out the tutorials (see above in “helpful links”) for a more detailed walk through.
For those that are switching existing apps over, I made an option especially for you. Just do the following and everything will be taken care of, your users won't even know anything changed:
# app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_authentic :act_like_restful_authentication => true end
The above will not change a thing, from your database's perspective it will be as if you are still using restful_authentication.
Or you can upgrade from Sha1 and transition your users to a much more secure encryption algorithm:
# app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_authentic :transition_from_restful_authentication => true end
By default this will switch your users to Authlogic's Sha512 implementation. You do NOT have to use this. Check out the encryption methods section below for a list of encryption methods Authlogic provides you. If you want to use something besides Sha512 just specify it by doing:
# app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_authentic :transition_from_restful_authentication => true, :crypto_provider => Authlogic::CryptoProviders::BCrypt end
Every time a user logs in their password will be upgraded and every time a new account is created it will use the new algorithm all while allowing users to login with the old algorithm.
For more information checkout my blog post on this: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/23/tutorial-easily-migrate-from-restful_authentication-to-authlogic
Just like ActiveRecord has “magic” columns, such as: created_at and updated_at. Authlogic has its own “magic” columns too:
Column name Description login_count Increased every time an explicit login is made. This will *NOT* increase if logging in by a session, cookie, or basic http auth last_request_at Updates every time the user logs in, either by explicitly logging in, or logging in by cookie, session, or http auth current_login_at Updates with the current time when an explicit login is made. last_login_at Updates with the value of current_login_at before it is reset. current_login_ip Updates with the request remote_ip when an explicit login is made. last_login_ip Updates with the value of current_login_ip before it is reset.
Authlogic tries to check the state of the record before creating the session. If your record responds to the following methods and any of them return false, validation will fail:
Method name Description active? Is the record marked as active? approved? Has the record been approved? confirmed? Has the record been conirmed?
Authlogic does nothing to define these methods for you, its up to you to define what they mean. If your object responds to these methods Authlogic will use them, otherwise they are ignored.
What's neat about this is that these are checked upon any type of login. When logging in explicitly, by cookie, session, or basic http auth. So if you mark a user inactive in the middle of their session they wont be logged back in next time they refresh the page. Giving you complete control.
Need Authlogic to check your own “state”? No problem, check out the hooks section below. Add in a before_validation to do your own checking. The sky is the limit.
Just like ActiveRecord you can create your own hooks / callbacks so that you can do whatever you want when certain actions are performed. Such as before_save, after_save, etc.
before_create after_create before_destroy after_destroy before_find after_find before_save after_save before_update after_update before_validation validate after_validation
See Authlogic::Session::Callbacks for more information
You're asking: “why would I want multiple sessions?”. Take this example:
You have an app where users login and then need to re-login to view / change their billing information. Similar to how Apple's me.com works. What you could do is have the user login with their normal session, then have an entirely new session that represents their “secure” session. But wait, this is 2 users sessions. No problem:
# regular user session @user_session = UserSession.new @user_session.id # => nil # secure user session @secure_user_session = UserSession.new(:secure) @secure_user_session.id # => :secure
This will keep everything separate. The :secure session will store its info in a separate cookie, separate session, etc. Just set the id and you are good to go. Need to retrieve the session?
@user_session = UserSession.find @secure_user_session = UserSession.find(:secure)
For more information on ids checkout Authlogic::Session::Base#id
Authlogic is designed so you can use any encryption method you want. It delegates this task to a class of your choice. Authlogic comes preloaded with some common algorithms:
Authlogic::CryptoProviders::Sha1 (used mainly for migrating from restful_authentication)
Authlogic::CryptoProviders::BCrypt (requires bcrypt-ruby gem)
Authlogic::CryptoProviders::AES256 (requires you to supply a key, see the AES256 class in the docs for more info)
By default Authlogic uses salted Sha512 with 20 stretches, but you can easily change this. For example, if you wanted to use the BCrypt algorithm just do the following:
acts_as_authentic :crypto_provider => Authlogic::CryptoProviders::BCrypt
For more information on BCrypt checkout my blog post on it: www.binarylogic.com/2008/11/22/storing-nuclear-launch-codes-in-your-app-enter-bcrypt-for-authlogic
Also, check out the Authlogic::CryptoProviders module and subclasses to get an idea of how to write your own crypto provider. You don't have to use the provided classes, you can easily write your own. All that you have to do is make a class with a class level encrypt and matches? method. That's it, all of the encryption and decryption logic is left to you.
Switching to a new encryption method used to be a pain in the ass. Authlogic has an option that makes this dead simple. Let's say you want to migrate to the BCrypt encryption method from Sha512:
acts_as_authentic :crypto_provider => Authlogic::CryptoProviders::BCrypt, :transition_from_crypto_provider => Authlogic::CryptoProviders::Sha512
That's it. When a user successfully logs in and is using the old method their password will be updated with the new method and all new registrations will use the new method as well. Your users won't know anything changed.
But wait, what if a couple of years later CCrypt comes out and its better than BCrypt and you're still in the middle of transitioning all of your users to BCrypt. Oh no!
Not to worry, because Authlogic can transition your users from more than one algorithm. Just pass an array to :transition_from_crypto_provider
acts_as_authentic :crypto_provider => CCrypt, :transition_from_crypto_provider => [Authlogic::CryptoProviders::Sha512, Authlogic::CryptoProviders::BCrypt]
That's it, specify as many as you want. One thing to keep in mind here is that if you are using BCrypt you should never have to do this. All that you need to do is increase the cost to make the algorithm stronger, no need to jump to entirely new algorithm. I did this for example purposes only.
To start, let me define tokens as Authlogic sees it. A token is a form of credentials that grants some type of access to their account. Depending on the type of access, a different type of token may be needed. Put simply, it's a way for the user to say “I am this person, let me proceed”. What types of different access you ask? Here are just a few:
Regular account access
Access to reset their password
Access to a private feed
Access to confirm their account
There could be many more depending on your application. What's great about Authlogic is that it doesn't care what you do or how you want to grant access to accounts. That's up to you and your application. Authlogic just cares about the type of tokens you need. Instead of giving you a token for each specific task, it gives you all of the necessary types of tokens, and you get to use them how you wish. It maintains the tokens and gives you all of the tools you need to use them. Just add the fields to your database and you are good to go.
Here are the 3 tokens in more detail:
This token is used to persist the user's session. This is the token that is stored in the session and the cookie, so that during each request the user stays logged in. What's unique about this token is that the first time it is used the value is stored in the session, thus persisting the session. This field is required and must be in your database.
This token is used for single access only, it is not persisted. Meaning the user provides it, Authlogic grants them access, and that's it. If they want access again they need to provide the token again. Authlogic will NEVER store this value in the session or a cookie. For added security, by default this token is ONLY allowed for RSS and ATOM requests. Also, this token does NOT change with the password. Meaning if the user changes their password, this token will remain the same. Lastly, this token uses a “friendly” token (see the URL example below) so that it is easier to email / copy and paste. You can change all of this with configuration (see Authlogic::Session::config), so if you don't like how this works by default, just set some simple configuration in your session.
For even more flexibility Authlogic looks for a method in your controller called single_access_allowed?. If that method exists and returns true Authlogic will try to log in the user with this method. Here is a quick example:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
private def single_access_allowed? action_name == "index" end
The above will only allow logging in via the single access toke with the index method only.
This field is optional, if you want to use it just add the field to your database:
t.string :single_access_token, :null => false # or call it feeds_token, feed_token, or whatever you want with configuration
This is great for private feed access. So your URL to that user's private feed could look something like:
The user_credentials parameter name is configurable (see Authlogic::Session::Config), but if that parameter exists Authlogic will automatically use it to try and grant that user access. You don't have to do a thing: UserSession.find will take care of it just like it does for everything else.
For more information see: Authlogic::ORMAdapters::ActiveRecordAdapter::ActsAsAuthentic::SingleAccess
This token is used for temporary account access, hence the term “perishable”. This token is constantly changing, it changes…
In a before_validation in your model, so basically every time the record is saved
Any time a new session is successfully saved (aka logged in)
This is perfect for resetting passwords or confirming accounts. You email them a url with this token in it, and then use this token to find the record and perform your action.
This field is optional, if you want to use it just add the field to your database:
t.string :perishable_token, :null => false # or call it password_reset_token, pw_reset_token, activation_token, or whatever you want with configuration
Finding the record with this token couldn't be easier, Authlogic provides a special finder method that you can use. I highly recommend using it as it adds extra security:
User.find_using_perishable_token(token) User.find_using_perishable_token(token, 20.minutes)
That's all you need to do to locate the record. Here is what it does for extra security:
Ignores blank tokens all together. If a blank token is passed nil will be returned.
It checks the age of the token, by default the threshold is 10 minutes, meaning if the token is older than 10 minutes, it is not valid and no record will be returned. You can change the default or just override it by passing the threshold as the second parameter. If you don't want a threshold at all, pass 0.
Just like the single access token this uses a friendly token, so it is easier to email / copy and paste.
For a detailed tutorial on how to reset password using this token see the helpful links section above.
For more information see: Authlogic::ORMAdapters::ActiveRecordAdapter::ActsAsAuthentic::Perishability
Scoping with authentication is a little tricky because it can come in many different flavors:
Accounts have many users, meaning users can only belong to one account at a time.
Accounts have and belong to many users, meaning a user can belong to more than one account.
Users access their accounts via subdomains.
Users access their accounts by selecting their account and storing their selection, NOT using subdomains. Maybe you store their selection in a session, cookie, or the database. It doesn't matter.
Now mix and match the above, it can get pretty hairy. Fear not, because Authlogic is designed in a manner where it doesn't care how you do it, all that you have to do is break it down. When scoping a session there are 3 parts you might want to scope:
The model (the validations, etc)
The session (finding the record)
The cookies (the names of the session key and cookie)
I will describe each below, in order.
This scopes your login field validation, so that users are allowed to have the same login, just not in the same account.
# app/models/user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_authentic :scope => :account_id end
When the session tries to validate it searches for a record. You want to scope that search. No problem…
The goal of Authlogic was to not try and introduce anything new. As a result I came up with:
@account.user_sessions.find @account.user_sessions.create @account.user_sessions.build # ... etc
This works just like ActiveRecord, so it should come natural. Here is how you get this functionality:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base authenticates_many :user_sessions end
What's neat about cookies is that if you use sub domains they automatically scope their self. Meaning if you create a cookie in whatever.yourdomain.com it will not exist in another.yourdomain.com. So if you are using subdomains to scope your users, you don't have to do anything.
But what if you *don't* want to separate your cookies by subdomains? You can accomplish this by doing:
ActionController::Base.session_options[:session_domain] = '.mydomain.com'
or for Rails 2.3.0 or higher:
ActionController::Base.session_options[:domain] = '.mydomain.com'
Notice the above is configuration for your session, not your cookies. Authlogic notices this and assume this is how you want to treat your cookies as well. As a result, it applies this domain to the cookies it sets. Now your session and all cookies act the same and are scoped under the same domain under Authlogic.
Now let's look at this from the other angle. What if you are NOT using subdomains, but still want to separate cookies for each account. Simple, set the :scope_cookies option for authenticate_many:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base authenticates_many :user_sessions, :scope_cookies => true end
Done, Authlogic will give each cookie a unique name depending on the account.
With the above information you should be able to scope your sessions any way you want. Just mix and match the tools above to accomplish this. Also check out the documentation on Authlogic::ActiveRecord::AuthenticatesMany.
The errors in Authlogic work JUST LIKE ActiveRecord. In fact, it uses the exact same ActiveRecord errors class. Use it the same way:
class UserSession before_validation :check_if_awesome private def check_if_awesome errors.add(:login, "must contain awesome") if login && !login.include?("awesome") errors.add_to_base("You must be awesome to log in") unless record.awesome? end end
Think about financial websites, if you are inactive for a certain period of time you will be asked to log back in on your next request. You can do this with Authlogic easily, there are 2 parts to this:
Define the timeout threshold:
acts_as_authentic :logged_in_timeout => 10.minutes # default is 10.minutes
Enable logging out on timeouts
class UserSession < Authlogic::Session::Base logout_on_timeout true # default if false end
This will require a user to log back in if they are inactive for more than 10 minutes. In order for this feature to be used you must have a last_request_at datetime column in your table for whatever model you are authenticating with.
This is one of my favorite features that I think is pretty cool. It's things like this that make a library great and let you know you are on the right track.
Just to clear up any confusion, Authlogic stores both the record id and the persistence token in the session. Why? So stale sessions can not be persisted. It stores the id so it can quickly find the record, and the persistence token to ensure no sessions are stale. The persistence token changes with the password, if someone is logged in and their password is changed, they should be logged out, unless they made the change. That being said, the person making the change needs their session to be updated with the new persistence token, so they stay logged in, which is what this section is all about.
So what if a user changes their password? You have to re-log them in with the new password, recreate the session, etc. This is messy and leads to redundant code. Or what if a user creates a new user account? You have to do the same thing. Here's an even better one: what if a user is in the admin area and changes their own password? There might even be another place passwords can change. It shouldn't matter, your code should be written in a way where you don't have to remember to do this.
Instead of updating sessions all over the place, doesn't it make sense to do this at a lower level? Like the User model? You're saying “but Ben, models can't mess around with sessions and cookies”. True…but Authlogic can, and you can access Authlogic just like a model. I know in most situations it's not good practice to do this, but I view this in the same class as sweepers, and feel like it actually is good practice here. User sessions are directly tied to users, they should be connected on the model level.
Fear not, because the acts_as_authentic method you call in your model takes care of this for you, by adding an after_save callback to automatically keep the session up to date. You don't have to worry about it anymore. Don't even think about it. Let your UsersController deal with users, not users AND sessions. ANYTIME the user changes his password in ANY way, his session will be updated.
Here is basically how this is done.…
class User < ActiveRecord::Base after_save :maintain_sessions! private def maintain_sessions! # If we aren't logged in and a user is created, log them in as that user # If we aren't logged in and a user's password changes, log them in as that user # If we are logged in and they change their password, update the session so they remain logged in end end
Obviously there is a little more to it than this, but hopefully this clarifies any confusion. Basically if you are *logged out* and you are changing passwords, Authlogic will log you in, since you already know the password for that account. Lastly, this can be altered / disabled via a configuration option. Just set :session_ids => nil when calling acts_as_authentic.
When things come together like this I think its a sign that you are doing something right. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
Please see Authlogic::I18n for more information. Internationalization is very easy to implement, in fact if you are using the default rails I18n library then you don't need to do anything other than defining the messages in your localization configuration files. See Authlogic::I18n for a complete list of keys you need to define.
Testing with authlogic is easy, there is a helper file that will add some convenient test helpers for you. In your test_helper.rb file do the following:
# test/test_helper.rb require 'authlogic/testing/test_unit_helpers'
You get the following methods:
set_session_for(record_object) set_cookie_for(record_object) set_http_auth_for(username, password)
In your test, before you execute a request, just call one of those methods and it will set the proper values so that it will seem as if that record is logged in.
You can also checkout the authlogic_example application (see helpful links above), the tests there use this.
I designed Authlogic to be framework agnostic, meaning it doesn't care what framework you use it in. Right out of the box it supports rails and merb. I have not had the opportunity to use other frameworks, but the only thing stopping Authlogic from being used in other frameworks is a simple adapter. Check out controller_adapters/rails_adapter, or controller_adapters/merb_adapter.
Since pretty much all of the frameworks in ruby follow the Rack standards, the code should be very similar across adapters. In fact that abstract adapter assumes you are following the Rack standards. If your framework is following the rack standards, there really isn't any code you should have to write. Check out the merb_adapter to see for yourself, the merb adapter is basically blank. You're saying “but Ben, why not just hook into Rack and avoid the need for controller adapters all together?”. It's not that simple, because rails doesn't inherit from the Rack::Request class, plus there are small differences between how rack is implemented in each framework. Authlogic has to hook into your controller with a before_filter anyways, so it can “activate” itself. Why not just use the controller object? Also when we have access to the controller object we can do other nifty things. Checkout the OpenID tutorial in the helpful links section above to see what I mean.
The point in all of this rambling is that implementing Authlogic is as simple as creating an adapter. I created both the rails and merb adapters in under 10 minutes. If you have an adapter you created and would like to add please let me know and I will add it into the source.
Interested in how all of this all works? Basically a before filter is automatically set in your controller which lets Authlogic know about the current controller object. This “activates” Authlogic and allows Authlogic to set sessions, cookies, login via basic http auth, etc. If you are using your framework in a multiple thread environment, don't worry. I kept that in mind and made this thread safe.
From there it is pretty simple. When you try to create a new session the record is authenticated and then all of the session / cookie magic is done for you. The sky is the limit.
You probably don't care, but I think releasing the millionth ruby authentication solution requires a little explanation.
I don't necessarily think the current solutions are “wrong”, nor am I saying Authlogic is the answer to your prayers. But, to me, the current solutions were lacking something. Here's what I came up with…
Generators have their place, and it is not to add authentication to an app. It doesn't make sense. Generators are meant to be a starting point for repetitive tasks that have no sustainable pattern. Take controllers, the set up is the same thing over and over, but they eventually evolve to a point where there is no clear cut pattern. Trying to extract a pattern out into a library would be extremely hard, messy, and overly complicated. As a result, generators make sense here.
Authentication is a one time set up process for your app. It's the same thing over and over and the pattern never really changes. The only time it changes is to conform with newer / stricter security techniques. This is exactly why generators should not be an authentication solution. Generators add code to your application, once code crosses that line, you are responsible for maintaining it. You get to make sure it stays up with the latest and greatest security techniques. And when the plugin you used releases some major update, you can't just re-run the generator, you get to sift through the code to see what changed. You don't really have a choice either, because you can't ignore security updates.
Using a library that hundreds of other people use has it advantages. Probably one of the biggest advantages if that you get to benefit from other people using the same code. When Bob in California figures out a new awesome security technique and adds it into Authlogic, you get to benefit from that with a single update. The catch is that this benefit is limited to code that is not “generated” or added into your app. As I said above, once code is “generated” and added into your app, it's your responsibility.
Lastly, there is a pattern here, why clutter up all of your applications with the same code over and over?
Just as I stated in the above section, you can't stay up to date with your security since the code is generated and updating the plugin does nothing. If there is one thing you should stay up to date with, it's security. But it's not just the fact that there is no reasonable method for receiving updates. It's the fact that they tie you down to an encryption algorithm AND they use a bad one at that. Every single solution I've seen uses Sha1, which is joining the party with MD5. Sha1 is not as secure as it used to be. But that's the nature of algorithms, they eventually get phased out, which is fine. Everyone knows this, why not accommodate for this? Authlogic does this with the :transition_from_crypto_provider option. It takes care of transitioning all of your users to a new algorithm. Even better, it provides BCrypt as an option which should, in theory, never require you to switch since you can adjust the cost and make the encryption stronger. At the same time, still compatible with older passwords using the lower cost.
I've noticed my apps get cluttered with authentication tests, and they are the same exact tests! This irritates me. When you have identical tests across your apps thats a red flag that code can be extracted into a library. What's great about Authlogic is that I tested it for you. You don't write tests that test the internals of ActiveRecord do you? The same applies for Authlogic. Only test code that you've written. Essentially testing authentication is similar to testing any another RESTful controller. This makes your tests focused and easier to understand.
I recently had an app where you could log in as a user and also log in as an employee. I won't go into the specifics of the app, but it made the most sense to do it this way. So I had two sessions in one app. None of the current solutions I found easily supported this. They all assumed a single session. One session was messy enough, adding another just put me over the edge and eventually forced me to write Authlogic. Authlogic can support 100 different sessions easily and in a clean format. Just like an app can support 100 different models and 100 different records of each model.
A lot of them forced me to name my password column as “this”, or the key of my cookie had to be “this”. They were a little too presumptuous. I am probably overly picky, but little details like that should be configurable. This also made it very hard to implement into an existing app.
I am not trying to “bash” any other authentication solutions. These are just my opinions, formulate your own opinion. I released Authlogic because I was “scratching my own itch”. It has made my life easier and I enjoy using it, hopefully it does the same for you.
Copyright © 2008 Ben Johnson of [Binary Logic](www.binarylogic.com), released under the MIT license