Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Response code 201 is ok after MODE READER #2

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Response code 201 is ok after MODE READER #2

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sbigaret
Copy link
Contributor

cf. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3977#section-5.3

Not considering 201 as Ok prevents newsreaders using libetpan to work
correctly when it happens: without the patch they get
UNEXPECTED_RESPONSE.

Ref. bug #3390872 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3390872&group_id=41064&atid=429696

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Bigaret sebastien.bigaret@telecom-bretagne.eu

cf. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3977#section-5.3

Not considering 201 as Ok prevents newsreaders using libetpan to work
correctly when it happens: withou the patch they get
UNEXPECTED_RESPONSE.

Ref. bug #3390872 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3390872&group_id=41064&atid=429696

Signed-off-by: Sébastien Bigaret <sebastien.bigaret@telecom-bretagne.eu>
@dinhvh dinhvh closed this Aug 15, 2011
@sbigaret
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi,
May I respectfully ask why it was closed but not merged?
This caused a real problem in claws-mail recently, and we had to accept UNEXPECTED after mode_reader() to circumvent it.
__ Sébastien.

@dinhvh
Copy link
Owner

dinhvh commented Aug 15, 2011

because it has been merged manually and it was not pushed.
I just pushed it into master.

@sbigaret
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh ok, nice!
Many thanks for your time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants