Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect colors on the progressbar in gtk2 #28

Open
roberth1990 opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Incorrect colors on the progressbar in gtk2 #28

roberth1990 opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@roberth1990
Copy link

As you can see the colors on the progressbar for each torrent doesn't make sense.

deluge

I have unhooked the "Apply colors to non-Qt applications" as suggested for another bug.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 26, 2015

This must be an application-specific bug. Can you let us know which application this is so we can more easily debug it?

@roberth1990
Copy link
Author

The application is deluge.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 26, 2015

Thanks for the info. Yeah, Deluge's hardcoded progressbars are notorious for being difficult with any advanced theming.

I think we could still fix the colors even though I'm not sure we can prevent them from being flat with the pixmap engine. I'll take a look at the new color-support branch and see if there's some way to get it working with dynamic color schemes.

@amon-sha
Copy link

Well, the problem is not in deluge.
The progress bars in standard gtk-demo (Tree View → Editable Cells) are not styled correctly too:
screenshot_20161229_170014
The problem might be either in the theme, or in pixmap engine ("geramic" theme, which uses qtpixmap engine (modified pixmap engine) suffers the same issue).

@carlosgeos
Copy link

Changing the GNOME application style to oxygen-gtk fixes the colour issue:
Screenshot_20190324_091113
Screenshot_20190324_091131

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants