Skip to content


Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
Download ZIP
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
64 lines (49 sloc) 2.74 KB

Dispatch in Android

Many people are writing Android applications in Scala and want to do their HTTP communications with Dispatch. Unfortunately, this is not as easy as it should be.

Android's HttpClient

The Android platform ships with the Apache HttpClient library. It is packaged in the same JAR as the "Java" standard library. From an application perspective it is just there, always.

When packaging for Android, you should be sure not to include any HttpClient jars; the classloader will always find the stock client's classes first. This allows apps that require HTTP communication—nearly all apps—to save space.

The downside of shipping libraries in the standard classpath is that the environment becomes rigidly coupled to them. If you want to take advantage of a new feature in a library, too bad. You'd have to wait until all of your users upgrade their operating system to the new version—if it's ever made available for their devices.

But wait, it gets worse! Updates to the HttpClient libraries in Android stalled. There was a procedural issue with binary compatibility; see this thread for the gory details. The short of it is, we can rule out just waiting for those parties to fix the situation.

Dealing with It

Versions of Dispatch through 0.7.x can work with Android's random old version of HttpClient just fine. Version 0.8.x however depends on newer major versions of the HttpComponents libraries and certain interfaces that are not compatible with the code shipped with Android.

It is possible to include the newer HttpComponents artifacts in the application package and to trick the classloader into finding them. How? You can obfuscate the class and package names with ProGuard, eliminating the namespace collisions.

But really: isn't programming hard enough without some bytecode analyzer changing the names of all your symbols prior to runtime? For most of us, yes. That's why it's recommended here that you use Dispatch 0.7.x with Android. That works without any tricks and it's still a lot nicer than having to code to the client directly.

What's in Store

This unfortunate problem underscores the need for Dispatch to be independent of any single backend. The primary advancement of 0.8 was to support HttpComponet's async NIO client in addition to its standard blocking client, but that (like the rest of 0.8) is unusable on Android without some serious hackery.

Dispatch 0.9 will therefore need to support entirely different backends such as Netty or one of the higher level async clients built on Netty. And main reason to choose a backend like that for Andorid apps will be, ironically enough, its absence in the platform distribution.

Jump to Line
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.