From 406f9d1fa0424e9861c2d20a1001dbf4e29d4c9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Phalip <jphalip@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed #7609 -- Noted in the model fields reference
 documentation that `PositiveIntegerField` accepts the value 0 for
 backwards-compatibility reasons. Thanks to everyone involved in the
 resolution of this issue, including Paul Collins for the patch.

git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@16972 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
---
 docs/ref/models/fields.txt | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/ref/models/fields.txt b/docs/ref/models/fields.txt
index cc89142b4dd5f..6c9dbf5a877f6 100644
--- a/docs/ref/models/fields.txt
+++ b/docs/ref/models/fields.txt
@@ -805,7 +805,8 @@ this as a ``<select>`` box with "Unknown", "Yes" and "No" choices.
 
 .. class:: PositiveIntegerField([**options])
 
-Like an :class:`IntegerField`, but must be positive.
+Like an :class:`IntegerField`, but must be either positive or zero (`0`).
+The value `0` is accepted for backward compatibility reasons.
 
 ``PositiveSmallIntegerField``
 -----------------------------