Skip to content


Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
Download ZIP
Browse files

Added some documentation explaining "managed=False" vs. "proxy=True".

These features look similar, but they're not identical. They can't be merged
into one (without requiring at least two Meta parameters anyway), so we've made
them have APIs that match their natural use-cases most easily.

Anyway, the documentation explains both the details and gives some simple to
follow rules.

git-svn-id: bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
  • Loading branch information...
1 parent c485e23 commit 96d5d434fac940aff854c939bef74394fe2c586e @malcolmt malcolmt committed
Showing with 46 additions and 0 deletions.
  1. +4 −0 docs/ref/models/options.txt
  2. +42 −0 docs/topics/db/models.txt
4 docs/ref/models/options.txt
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ attribute.
For tests involving models with ``managed=False``, it's up to you to ensure
the correct tables are created as part of the test setup.
+If you're interested in changing the Python-level behaviour of a model class,
+you *could* use ``managed=True`` and create a copy of an existing model.
+However, there's a better approach for that situation: :ref:`proxy-models`.
42 docs/topics/db/models.txt
@@ -1117,6 +1117,48 @@ containing the new managers and inherit that after the primary base class::
You probably won't need to do this very often, but, when you do, it's
+Differences between proxy inheritance and unmanaged models
+Proxy model inheritance might look fairly similar to creating an unmanaged
+model, using the :attr:`~django.db.models.Options.managed` attribute on a
+model's ``Meta`` class. The two alternatives are not quite the same and it's
+worth considering which one you should use.
+One difference is that you can (and, in fact, must unless you want an empty
+model) specify model fields on models with ``Meta.managed=False``. You could,
+with careful setting of :attr:`Meta.db_table
+<django.db.models.Options.db_table>` create an unmanaged model that shadowed
+an existing model and add Python methods to it. However, that would be very
+repetitive and fragile as you need to keep both copies synchronized if you
+make any changes.
+The other difference that is more important for proxy models, is how model
+managers are handled. Proxy models are intended to behave exactly like the
+model they are proxying for. So they inherit the parent model's managers,
+including the default manager. In the normal multi-table model inheritance
+case, children do not inherit managers from their parents as the custom
+managers aren't always appropriate when extra fields are involved. The
+:ref:`manager documentation <custom-managers-and-inheritance>` has more
+details about this latter case.
+When these two features were implemented, attempts were made to squash them
+into a single option. It turned out that interactions with inheritance, in
+general, and managers, in particular, made the API very complicated and
+potentially difficult to understand and use. It turned out that two options
+were needed in any case, so the current separation arose.
+So, the general rules are:
+ 1. If you are mirroring an existing model or database table and don't want
+ all the original database table columns, use ``Meta.managed=False``.
+ That option is normally useful for modeling database views and tables
+ not under the control of Django.
+ 2. If you are wanting to change the Python-only behavior of a model, but
+ keep all the same fields as in the original, use ``Meta.proxy=True``.
+ This sets things up so that the proxy model is an exact copy of the
+ storage structure of the original model when data is saved.
Multiple inheritance

0 comments on commit 96d5d43

Please sign in to comment.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.