Add .travis.yml for CI #22

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 8, 2012

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
Contributor

jc00ke commented Nov 12, 2012

In support of rubinius/rubinius#2006 let's get this working on Travis.

The tests fail on all 4 rubies locally so expect the Travis run to fail.

Contributor

jc00ke commented Nov 12, 2012

Hmm, maybe something is up with my machine. Regardless, all 4 rubies pass on Travis. Sweet!

Is the .travis.yml file a standard to include in gems now? I mean, will this be beneficial outside of Rubinius?

Owner

jc00ke replied Nov 13, 2012

It's becoming standard, and it is beneficial to all of the Ruby implementations, not just Rubinius.

It's a good way to communicate the status of your library.

We on the Rubinius project are trying to support as many gems with C-ext as possible. Travis is a great way to help us coordinate that.

Owner

jc00ke replied Nov 13, 2012

Yes, it's becoming the standard, as it communicates the status of your library to anyone that wants to use it.

It's definitely beneficial to all of the implementations, not just Rubinius.

We on the Rubinius team are trying to find libraries with C-extensions that can be tested against Rubinius to ferret out anything we may have missed or need to support.

Owner

jc00ke replied Nov 13, 2012

Yes, it's becoming the standard, as it communicates the status of your library to anyone that wants to use it.

It's definitely beneficial to all of the implementations, not just Rubinius.

We on the Rubinius team are trying to find libraries with C-extensions that can be tested against Rubinius to ferret out anything we may have missed or need to support.

Owner

jc00ke replied Nov 13, 2012

Contributor

jc00ke commented Nov 13, 2012

Sorry for the repeat comments. My browser wasn't updating & it looked like they were not going through. 😦

Contributor

jc00ke commented Nov 19, 2012

Think we could get this merged? Thanks!

djberg96 merged commit 8455b75 into djberg96:master Dec 8, 2012

Contributor

jc00ke commented Dec 8, 2012

Thank you for merging!

It looks like you may need to set up the Travis token in the Travis webhook on GH.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment