As discussed in issue #150 and on mu-discuss. I didn't see an elisp style notes anywhere. I did add two small helpers but chose not to prefix them with mu4e because I don't see them being used by end-users. I'm not sure if that was the right way to go, so let me know and I can change it.
replaces sed with elisp in re-tag action
* mu4e: replaces sed with elisp in re-tag action
mu4e: fixes new elisp re-tag implementation for forward slashes
Looks good to me (though I don't use tagging myself) -- but could you prefix you helper-functions with mu4e~ to be consistent with the rest? Thanks!
* mu4e: uses correct helper function naming conventions.
* mu4e: Whoops, uses actual correct helper function naming convention…
…s (~ instead of -)