Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parameter storage class in is an equivalent of const currently; see a… #2126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2018
Merged

Parameter storage class in is an equivalent of const currently; see a… #2126

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2018

Conversation

carblue
Copy link
Contributor

@carblue carblue commented Jan 25, 2018

…lso discussion in issue #17928; may change later to const scope

…lso discussion in issue #17928; may change later to const scope
@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request, @carblue! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.

Some tips to help speed things up:

  • smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones

  • try not to mix up refactoring or style changes with bug fixes or feature enhancements

  • provide helpful commit messages explaining the rationale behind each change

Bear in mind that large or tricky changes may require multiple rounds of review and revision.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Description
17928 [scope] in is not treated as const scope

@MetaLang
Copy link
Member

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that a decision is not needed from @andralex or @WalterBright. This change was deliberate on Walter's part and needs to be documented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants