Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue 22027 - inout doesn't imply return #3259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 22, 2022

Conversation

dkorpel
Copy link
Contributor

@dkorpel dkorpel commented Mar 22, 2022

DMD PR: dlang/dmd#12689

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @dkorpel! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Severity Description
22027 enhancement inout shouldn't imply return

@dkorpel
Copy link
Contributor Author

dkorpel commented Mar 22, 2022

DMD PR merged
@RazvanN7

@RazvanN7 RazvanN7 merged commit f6e630a into dlang:master Mar 22, 2022
@dkorpel dkorpel deleted the separate-inout-return branch March 22, 2022 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants