You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the docs (https://dlang.org/spec/operatoroverloading.html#slice_assignment_operator), this should work as:
> Expressions of the form a[i..j] = c are rewritten as a.opIndexAssign(c, a.opSlice(i, j)), and a[] = c as a.opIndexAssign(c).---
struct Foo
{
int payload;
auto ref opSlice(size_t start, size_t end)
{
return this;
}
auto opIndexAssign(T)(T elem, Foo foo)
{
pragma(msg, "opIndexAssign");
return this;
}
}
void main(string[] args)
{
Foo foo;
pragma(msg, typeof(foo[0..2]));
foo[0..2] = 3;
}
---
However, it fails with
> test.d(20): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression 3 of type int to Foo
AFAICT there's no reason why this lowering should fail (and at the very least, the error message needs to be improved).
As a workaround the legacy opSliceAssign can be used and looking at Phobos only opSliceAssign is used and there's no use of this specific newer opIndexAssign lowering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Works if opSlice is implemented as a template:
auto ref opSlice(size_t dim)(size_t start, size_t end) if (dim == 0)
According to reference, it should work as it is:
> If only one-dimensional slicing is desired, opSlice may be declared without the compile-time parameter.
Seb reported this on 2018-06-22T17:19:51Z
Transferred from https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19015
CC List
Description
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: