Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Issue 20518 - simple import ICE regression #10736

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2020

Conversation

BorisCarvajal
Copy link
Member

The assert was obsolete even p.isPkgMod doesn't change at all in that block.

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @BorisCarvajal! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Severity Description
20518 regression simple import ICE regression

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub fetch digger
dub run digger -- build "stable + dmd#10736"

@@ -160,15 +160,22 @@ extern (C++) final class Import : Dsymbol
{
if (p.isPkgMod == PKG.unknown)
{
uint preverrors = global.errors;
mod = Module.load(loc, packages, id);
if (!mod)
p.isPkgMod = PKG.package_;
else
{
// mod is a package.d, or a normal module which conflicts with the package name.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this comment still apply?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think yes, the first part is the true and the following is the error.

@dlang-bot dlang-bot merged commit 04a7710 into dlang:stable Jan 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants