Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix issue 20675 - dip1000 improper error about copying scope paramete… #10929

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2020

Conversation

aG0aep6G
Copy link
Contributor

…r into allocated memory

@WalterBright, you probably want to have a look.

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @aG0aep6G! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Severity Description
20675 normal dip1000 improper error about copying scope parameter into allocated memory

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + dmd#10929"

@WalterBright
Copy link
Member

Ya beat me to it :-) and it seems we came up with the same solution. Anyhow, the test case is excessive. It should be appended to test/compilation/scope.d and consist of merely:

// https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20675

struct D
{
    int pos;
    char* p;
}

void test(scope ref D d) @safe
{
    D[] da;
    da ~= D(d.pos, null);
}

This will make the incremental test time insignificant compared with making an executable.

Copy link
Member

@WalterBright WalterBright left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comment

@aG0aep6G
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anyhow, the test case is excessive. It should be appended to test/compilation/scope.d

done

@aG0aep6G
Copy link
Contributor Author

Similar bug and fix: #10935

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants