Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge stable #11400

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 9, 2020
Merged

merge stable #11400

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 9, 2020

Conversation

MartinNowak
Copy link
Member

  • Fix 20014: Make -{preview|revert|transition}=all work again
  • Fix Issue 20909 - .offsetof fails on forward reference of field
  • Fix Issue 20989 - Checking array.ptr causes safety error ...
  • bump VERSION to v2.093.0
  • purge changelog

Geod24 and others added 6 commits July 2, 2020 12:31
The code was probably changed at some point from a break to a return,
but the 'all' special case was not updated.
For clarity, some text was also edited: 'id' has been renamed to 'name',
as 'id' has been used in the past to mean number,
and it's also used this way for -version and -debug.
Finally, the description for 'all' was fixed.
... with -checkaction=context.

Explicity flag `DotIdExpressions` as `noderef` because `_d_assert_fail` will
not dereference the pointer and thus make the call `@safe`.
@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request, @MartinNowak!

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Severity Description
20014 regression [REG 2.084] -transition=all, -preview=all, -revert=all is invalid
20909 normal .offsetof fails on forward reference of field
20989 minor Checking array.ptr causes safety error with -checkaction=context

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + dmd#11400"

@dlang-bot dlang-bot merged commit 3130030 into dlang:master Jul 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants