-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 610
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix 22708 - Extend semantic for switch statements with invalid values #13617
Fix 22708 - Extend semantic for switch statements with invalid values #13617
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @MoonlightSentinel! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information. If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment. Bugzilla references
Testing this PR locallyIf you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR: dub run digger -- build "stable + dmd#13617" |
253845c to
0e4d396
Compare
0e4d396 to
37d0307
Compare
37d0307 to
b52cba0
Compare
Only omitting the cast allows further semantic to perform the expected checks and transformations. This allows for better error detection that were not reported before and also avoids invalid errors due to missing `optimize` calls.
Only omitting the cast allows further semantic to perform the expected checks and transformations. This allows for better error detection that were not reported before and also avoids invalid errors due to missing
optimizecalls.This effectively restores some of the semantic disabled by #13309 in the case of an invalid switch value
Best viewed with disabled whitespace diff. More examples of invalid code using switch statements would be appreciated, I'll also try to come up with some more test cases.
CC @schveiguy