Bug 435: Constructors should be templatized #703
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hmm how come 435 is generally requesting support for templated constructors while other reports like http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4749 report problems in the implementation thereof (i.e. it's basically working)? |
|
@Trass3r 4749 is about structs, 435 is about classes. |
|
ah thx, didn't notice that. |
Basically just applying Shin Fujishiro's patch, with some test cases.
WalterBright
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2012
Bug 435: Constructors should be templatized
braddr
pushed a commit
to braddr/dmd
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2012
Fix non-compiling example in BigInt docs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bug 435 - Constructors should be templatized
Basically just applying Shin Fujishiro's patch, with some test cases.