Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

let transcode accept mutable/const characters #4722

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 10, 2016

Conversation

aG0aep6G
Copy link
Contributor

@aG0aep6G aG0aep6G commented Aug 8, 2016

Because requiring immutable characters doesn't make sense.

See also http://forum.dlang.org/post/noashv$1bgv$1@digitalmars.com.

The second commit ("remove pointless variable t") is just a little cleanup I noticed when looking at this.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 88.74% (diff: 100%)

Merging #4722 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%

@@             master      #4722   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           121        121          
  Lines         74037      74037          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
- Hits          65705      65704     -1   
- Misses         8332       8333     +1   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a634ed...c3b6b42

@DmitryOlshansky
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@andralex
Copy link
Member

urgh what an awful function... thanks for improving it

@andralex
Copy link
Member

Auto-merge toggled on

@schveiguy
Copy link
Member

urgh what an awful function

Indeed. The whole module...

@andralex andralex merged commit 7978ee7 into dlang:master Aug 10, 2016
@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

Indeed. The whole module...

Seems like there is an overall consensus on this - see also this recent discussion http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.793.1470702307.3131.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com ;-)

@aG0aep6G aG0aep6G deleted the transcode branch August 11, 2016 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants