Memoize recurse regex#23
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Merged, thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi - Thanks for this project!
I'm using it in my project
dbanon. I did some profiling today and found that theregexp.MustCompilecalls insidefaker.Fetchwere the worst performance culprit indbanonby far. While I couldn't find a use-case for the recursive regex, I was able to drastically improve performance by memoizing the*Regexp.Below are some benchmarks.
usertable with 1 million rowsfaker.Name().FirstName()faker.Name().LastName()faker.Internet().Email()faker.Internet().Password(8, 14)Before
After
As you can see I was able to cut execution time for
dbanonfrom 95 seconds to 20 seconds with this change.