pure Go implementation of prediction part for GBRT (Gradient Boosting Regression Trees) models from popular frameworks
Switch branches/tags
Clone or download
Latest commit 15e14b1 Oct 6, 2018

README.md

leaves

Build Status GoDoc Coverage Status Go Report Card

Logo

Introduction

leaves is a library implementing prediction code for GBRT (Gradient Boosting Regression Trees) models in pure Go. The goal of the project - make it possible to use models from popular GBRT frameworks in Go programs without C API bindings.

Features

  • Support LightGBM (repo) models:
    • reading models from text format
    • supporting numerical & categorical features
    • supporting parallel predictions for batches
    • supporting multiclass predictions
    • addition optimizations for categorical features (for example, one hot decision rule)
    • addition optimizations exploiting only prediction usage
  • Support XGBoost (repo) models:
    • reading models from binary format
    • support gbtree and gblinear models
    • supporting multiclass predictions
    • supporting missing values (nan)
    • supporting parallel predictions for batches
  • Support scikit-learn (repo) tree models (experimental support):
    • reading models from pickle format (protocol 0)
    • support sklearn.ensemble.GradientBoostingClassifier
    • supporting parallel predictions for batches

Usage examples

In order to start, go get this repository:

go get github.com/dmitryikh/leaves

Minimal example:

package main

import (
	"fmt"

	"github.com/dmitryikh/leaves"
)

func main() {
	// 1. Read model
	model, err := leaves.LGEnsembleFromFile("lightgbm_model.txt")
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

	// 2. Do predictions!
	fvals := []float64{1.0, 2.0, 3.0}
	p := model.PredictSingle(fvals, 0)
	fmt.Printf("Prediction for %v: %f\n", fvals, p)
}

In order to use XGBoost model, just change leaves.LGEnsembleFromFile, to leaves.XGEnsembleFromFile. For mode usage examples see leaves_test.go.

Benchmark

Below are comparisons of prediction speed on batches (~1000 objects in 1 API call). Hardware: MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017), 2,9 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 ГБ 2133 MHz LPDDR3. C API implementations were called from python bindings. But large batch size should neglect overhead of python bindings. leaves benchmarks were run by means of golang test framework: go test -bench. See benchmark for mode details on measurments. See testdata/README.md for data preparation pipelines.

Single thread:

Test Case Features Trees Batch size C API leaves
LightGBM MS LTR 137 500 1000 49ms 51ms
LightGBM Higgs 28 500 1000 50ms 50ms
XGBoost Higgs 28 500 1000 44ms 50ms

4 threads:

Test Case Features Trees Batch size C API leaves
LightGBM MS LTR 137 500 1000 14ms 14ms
LightGBM Higgs 28 500 1000 14ms 14ms
XGBoost Higgs 28 500 1000 ? 14ms

? - currenly I'm unable to utilize multithreading form XGBoost predictions by means of python bindings

Limitations

  • LightGBM models:
    • no support transformations functions (sigmoid, lambdarank, etc). Output scores is raw scores
  • XGBoost models:
    • no support transformations functions. Output scores is raw scores
    • no support dart models
    • could be slight divergence between C API predictions vs. leaves because of floating point convertions and comparisons tolerances.
  • scikit-learn tree models:
    • no support transformations functions. Output scores is raw scores (as from GradientBoostingClassifier.decision_function)
    • only pickle protocol 0 is supported
    • could be slight divergence between sklearn predictions vs. leaves because of floating point convertions and comparisons tolerances.

Contacts

In case if you are interested in the project or if you have questions, please contact with me by email: khdmitryi at gmail.com