0.8alpha.0.2:

	Fix for methods on classes with incomplete subclasses (detected
	by KMR/McCLIM compilation)
	... distilled test for it.

src/pcl/dfun.lisp

@@ -1411,11 +1411,7 @@ And so, we are saved.
 		     (eq (cadr specl) (cadr type)))
 		    (class
 		     (or (eq (cadr specl) (cadr type))
-			 (memq (cadr specl)
-			       (if (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
-				   (class-precedence-list (cadr type))
-				   (early-class-precedence-list
-				    (cadr type)))))))))
+			 (memq (cadr specl) (cpl-or-nil (cadr type))))))))
 	(values pred pred))))
 
 (defun saut-prototype (specl type)
@@ -1428,10 +1424,7 @@ And so, we are saved.
 		(class-eq   (eq (cadr specl) (class-of (cadr type))))
 		(class      (memq (cadr specl)
 				  (let ((class (class-of (cadr type))))
-				    (if (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
-					(class-precedence-list class)
-					(early-class-precedence-list
-					 class))))))))
+				    (cpl-or-nil class)))))))
     (values pred pred)))
 
 (defun specializer-applicable-using-type-p (specl type)

tests/clos.impure-cload.lisp

@@ -63,6 +63,13 @@
 (defmethod baz ((x specializer1)) x)
 (assert (typep (baz (make-instance 'specializer1)) 'specializer1))
 
+;;; ... and from McCLIM, another test case:
+(defclass specializer1a (specializer2a specializer2b) ())
+(defclass specializer2a () ())
+(defmethod initialize-instance :after
+    ((obj specializer2a) &key &allow-other-keys)
+  (print obj))
+
 ;;; in a similar vein, we should be able to define methods on classes
 ;;; that are effectively unknown to the type system:
 (sb-mop:ensure-class 'unknown-type)

version.lisp-expr

@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@
 ;;; checkins which aren't released. (And occasionally for internal
 ;;; versions, especially for internal versions off the main CVS
 ;;; branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".)
-"0.8alpha.0.1"
+"0.8alpha.0.2"