MTLObjectCache: Correct signature of equality operator #11022
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Not doing so produces a warning in clang:
ISO C++20 considers use of overloaded operator '!=' (with operand types
'Metal::DepthStencilSelector' and 'Metal::DepthStencilSelector') to be
ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with
non-reversed arguments
The underlying reason for this warning is an incorrect method signature.
|
Makes sense to me. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
In C++20, the expression
DepthStencilSelector{} == DepthStencilSelector{}is non-conforming code without this change.The underlying reason for this reversed operators in C++20 results in two candidates being produced:
This results in an ambiguity due to there being two viable candidates.
Making
thisaconstreference solves this problem.