PatchEngine: Attempt to fix crash in IsStackSane #8886
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HostIsInstructionRAMAddress uses XCheckTLBFlag::OpcodeNoException, so we should also use XCheckTLBFlag::OpcodeNoException when reading, to ensure that we use the IBAT (as opposed to the DBAT) for both.
|
Makes sense to me, though I'm kinda surprised this hasn't been a problem before. I guess the two BATs are rarely different? And |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
HostIsInstructionRAMAddress uses XCheckTLBFlag::OpcodeNoException, so we should also use XCheckTLBFlag::OpcodeNoException when reading, to ensure that we use the IBAT (as opposed to the DBAT) for both.
I made this change in an attempt to fix a crash a user was experiencing at PatchEngine.cpp:234, but it seems like this change didn't actually fix that crash. I'm submitting it anyway because the mismatched behavior we have right now seems a little odd.