No description provided.
does this resolve #30 ?
I know this seems obvious enough, but can you include a description as to the reason for the change,
so I know how you are using it?
As a module author, you get very little feedback as to what your modules are actually being used for,
and how they are being used.
I think maybe the row should emit 'removed', since set already has a 'remove' event, that has the row as arguments.
It kind of solves #30.
I was going to use it in knockout-crdt-observable-array to avoid doing this.
removed indeed sounds better. I'll amend and push.
Emit `remove` on a row when it is removed
cool, this is merged into 3.6.0 !